Ants show remarkable ecological and evolutionary success due to their social life history and division of labour among colony members. In some lineages, the worker force became subdivided into morphologically distinct individuals (i.e. minor versus major workers), allowing for the differential performance of particular roles in the colony. However, the functional and ecological significance of these morphological differences are not well understood. Here, we applied finite element analysis (FEA) to explore the biomechanical differences between major and minor ant worker mandibles. Analyses were carried out on mandibles of two Pheidole species, a dimorphic ant genus. We tested whether major mandibles evolved to minimize stress when compared to minors using combinations of the apical tooth and masticatory margin bites under strike and pressure conditions. Majors performed better in pressure conditions yet, contrary to our expectations, minors performed better in strike bite scenarios. Moreover, we demonstrated that even small morphological differences in ant mandibles might lead to substantial differences in biomechanical responses to bite loading. These results also underscore the potential of FEA to uncover biomechanical consequences of morphological differences within and between ant workers.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The division of labor into sterile and reproductive castes in social insects is often reflected in marked morphological differences, which might have played an important role in the remarkable adaptive success of these organisms. Some ant lineages have undergone further morphological differentiation, with the evolution of differences within the worker caste. In this study, we characterize morphological diversity in the head of Pheidole ants by comparing differences in size and shape among species and between minor and major worker subcastes. To this end, we integrate data from high‐resolution images, geometric morphometrics, and phylogenetic comparative methods. Our results indicated differences in morphological variation of each subcaste with respect to their geographical distribution, with distinct morphological patterns and evolutionary routes related to head shape. Allometry was shown to be a crucial element for the differentiation within and between each subcaste, corroborating the role of size in their morphological evolution. Additionally, we observed that closely related species often diverge considerably in morphospace, whereas convergence in their morphospace occupation characterizes some West and East Hemisphere species. Finally, although multiple shifts in the rate of morphological evolution occurred during the Miocene, the timing and position of these shifts were independent of size and shape, suggesting that their evolution has been decoupled throughout Pheidole evolution.