This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain. Productivity change and its drivers for the Chilean water companies: A comparison of full private and concessionary companies.

This paper surveys the literature on scale and scope economies in the water and sewerage industry. The magnitude of scale and scope economies determines the cost efficient configuration of any industry. In the case of a regulated sector, reliable estimates of these economies are relevant to inform reform proposals that promote vertical (un)bundling and mergers. The empirical evidence allows some general conclusions. First, there is considerable evidence for the existence of vertical scope economies between upstream water production and distribution. Second, there is only mixed evidence on the existence of (dis)economies of scope between water and sewerage activities. Third, economies of scale exist up to certain output level, and diseconomies of scale arise if the company increases its size beyond this level. However, the optimal scale of utilities also appears to vary considerably between countries. Finally, we briefly consider the implications of our findings for water pricing and point to several directions for necessary future empirical research on the measurement of these economies, and explaining their cross country variation.

Aston Academy for Research in Management is the administrative centre for all research activities at Aston Business School. The School comprises more than 70 academic staff organised into thematic research groups along with a Doctoral Programme of more than 50 research students. Research is carried out in all of the major areas of business studies and a number of specialist fields. For further information contact:The AbstractIn this study we apply an index number approach to allow for cross sectional comparisons of relative profitability, productivity and price performance of the regulated Water and Sewerage companies (WaSCs) in England and Wales during the years 1991-2008. In order to better analyse the impact of regulation on WaSC performance, we decompose actual economic profits into spatial multilateral Fisher productivity (TFP), the inverse of which is demonstrated to be a regulatory excess cost index that measures the deviation of a firm's actual costs from benchmark costs, and a newly developed regulatory total price performance (TPP) index, which measures the excess of regulated revenues relative to benchmark costs.The results indicate that during the years 1991-2000 price caps were "weak" as prices were high enough for the firms to achieve economic profits despite their low productivity levels. However, after 2001 prices became "catch up promoting" as they required less productive companies to eliminate at least some excess costs in order to eliminate economic losses.When compared to alternative methodologies such as DEA and SFA, our index number based approach has the further advantage of allowing meaningful comparative performance measurement even if the number of available observations is extremely limited. We therefore suggest that our approach should be of great interest, not only to those researchers interested in evaluating the effectiveness of regulation, but also to those researchers more focused on developing effective comparative performance techniques, even if sample sizes are limited.

No abstract

No abstract