Objective
The aim of this study was to determine if there is a difference in Pelvic Floor Disability Index Questionnaire (PFDI-20) scores between black and white women seeking surgical management for pelvic organ prolapse (POP).
Methods
A retrospective cohort study of 232 women who underwent pelvic reconstructive surgery with apical suspension for POP was performed. Demographic and clinical data were collected. All women completed the PFDI-20 and had a Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification examination at the initial consultation. Appropriate statistical tests were used to compare black and white women. Multivariable regression models adjusting for demographic and clinical variables were developed to determine the independent relationship between race and POP symptoms.
Results
In our cohort, 174 (75%) were white and 58 (25%) were black. Compared with white women, black women had higher parity, body mass index, Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and anterior POP stage. White women had higher total PFDI-20 scores corresponding to higher scores on all symptom subscales. After controlling for potential confounders, white race and prior anti-incontinence surgery remained associated with higher total PFDI scores. Higher Urogenital Distress Inventory 6 scores were significantly associated with white race, prior anti-incontinence procedures, and increasing body mass index, whereas higher CRADI-8 scores were associated with prior anti-incontinence surgery and higher POP stages.
Conclusions
White women appeared to have more overall symptom bother from prolapse, as well as urinary symptoms, as compared with black women, when assessed by validated questionnaire tools in a cohort of patients who underwent prolapse surgery. Further research is required to determine if racial differences in symptoms translate to differences in outcomes.
Objectives
The primary aim was to compare the incidence of transient voiding dysfunction (TVD) between vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension, sacrospinous ligament fixation, and robotic sacrocolpopexy. Secondarily, we identified risk factors for TVD and associated postoperative complications.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study of women who underwent apical repair at 1 institution. Data were collected from electronic medical records and were presented as means (SD) or numbers (percent) as appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors for TVD and its associated postoperative complications.
Results
Three hundred sixty women were included in analysis. Two hundred nineteen (60.8%) passed their voiding trial and 141 (39.2%) experienced TVD. The TVD group demonstrated a higher age, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index score, and preoperative postvoid residual (all P < 0.05). Univariate analysis demonstrated higher rates of TVD in the vaginal uterosacral ligament suspension and sacrospinous ligament fixation groups compared with the robotic sacrocolpopexy group (P = 0.012). Transient voiding dysfunction occurred more frequently with a concomitant anti-incontinence procedure, anterior repair, and/or posterior repair (all P < 0.05). In multivariate analysis, only an anti-incontinence procedure and concomitant anterior repair were independently associated with a risk of TVD (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–3.62, and OR, 2.20; CI, 1.14–4.27, respectively). Transient voiding dysfunction was associated with a culture-proven urinary tract infection within 6 weeks (OR, 3.2; CI, 1.3–8.55).
Conclusions
There was no difference in TVD between types of apical repair. Concomitant anti-incontinence procedure and anterior repair were associated with TVD. Women with TVD have an increased risk of postoperative urinary tract infections.
This case provides additional evidence for bowel injury as a postoperative TVT complication and describes an approach to complicated TVT and persistent SUI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.