Objectives
To evaluate the feasibility of an additional therapeutic upper limb exercise (ULE) intervention in early phase post‐stroke rehabilitation and to assess outcomes of therapy using the Armeo Spring (ARMEO) versus Therapist‐assisted Table Top (TAT) interventions.
Design
Randomized, single‐blind trial.
Setting
Stroke acute inpatient rehabilitation unit.
Participants
Forty‐five participants early after first stroke, Fugl‐Meyer Assessment (FMA) score >8, Modified Ashworth score (MAS) of <3.
Interventions
Participants were randomized to TAT or ARMEO ULE in addition to the required 3 hours of 1:1 standard of care provided in an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF).
Main Outcome Measures
Completed number of treatments; withdrawals; serious/adverse events; Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor; FIM efficiency; FMA; MAS; elbow active (A) and passive (P) range of motion (ROM); and therapist effort measured by the Modified Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion Scale (RPE).
Results
Post‐intervention FIM and FMA scores increased but did not demonstrate any statistically significant differences between the intervention groups (P = .585, .962, partial n2 = .001, .001, respectively). There were no statistically significant differences in post‐intervention MAS elbow flexion and extension (P = .332, .252, partial n2 = .009, .007, respectively) and A/P ROM elbow extension between training groups (P = .841, .731, partial n2 = .001, .003, respectively). There was a statistically significant difference in post‐intervention A/P ROM elbow flexion between groups (P = .031, .018, partial n2 = .123, .146). Post‐intervention RPE did not show any statistically significant differences between the training groups (P = .128, partial n2 = .063). Total elbow range showed larger adjusted mean gains for the ARMEO. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that additional therapeutic ULE in the early phase of post‐stroke inpatient rehabilitation is feasible and that both interventions showed positive changes in selected outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.