110 Background: g BRCA2mut are associated with increased risk of PCa, breast cancer (BC), and ovarian cancer (OC). ~5% of men with metastatic PCa have g BRCA2mut. CGT is recommended for their relatives as there are implications for cancer prevention and early detection strategies. Little is known about CGT initiated by men with PCa. Here we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CGT in FDR of men with PCa and g BRCA2mut. Methods: A decision-analytic model was created with TreeAge software to compare BC and OC outcomes for female FDRs who underwent CGT for g BRCA2mut versus no CGT. Our theoretical cohort contained 100,000 females, a conservative estimate of patients who could benefit from CGT. We used literature derived estimates to determine the percentage of patients that would pursue risk-reducing mastectomy, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy, both surgeries, or surveillance after CGT. Outcomes included BC or OC diagnoses, survivorship, and cancer death. We derived all probabilities, costs, utilities, and life expectancies from the literature and discounted quality adjusted life years (QALYs) at a rate of 3%. Incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) was calculated to determine the cost per QALY gained and set the willingness-to-pay threshold at $100,000/QALY. We assessed the robustness of the model with sensitivity analyses. Results: In our theoretical cohort, CGT of female FDRs resulted in 12,910 less BC diagnoses and 6,360 less BC deaths. CGT was associated with lower BC death rates (26.1%) compared to no CGT (35.8%). CGT was not associated with reduction in OC diagnoses or deaths. Our model resulted in lower costs and higher QALYs (a dominant strategy) among the CGT cohort with an ICER of -$4,190.10 per QALY, saving an estimated $595 million. We found that CGT in females was the dominant strategy in 100% of the samples, once uncertainty was incorporated into our model inputs via Monte Carlo simulation. The cost-effectiveness of CGT for male FDRs will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: In this study, CGT of female FDRs of men with PCa and g BRCA2mut was the dominant strategy to improve BC outcomes, including increased survivorship and reduced BC development. Despite a lack of demonstrated benefit for OC, CGT was associated with reduced costs and increased QALYs. CGT for female FDRs of patients with PCa and g BRCA2mut may be a cost-effective approach for identifying and informing individuals with potentially harmful mutations. [Table: see text]
group. Primary outcome is a perinatal composite defined as delivery >41 weeks, hypertensive disorder of pregnancy at term, unplanned Cesarean delivery, term neonatal ICU admission, 42-day maternal readmission, and 7-day neonatal readmission. Additional maternal, neonatal, and delivery composites were also analyzed. All individual outcomes were secondarily evaluated. RESULTS: Of 2,268 deliveries, 1,210 occurred during the COVID-19 period. Four of the 1,210 (0.3%) were diagnosed with COVID-19. Women during the COVID-19 period were more likely to present in spontaneous labor and less likely to undergo induction. Maternal and neonatal length of stay was also shorter. There was no difference in the perinatal composite between the two groups (36.3% vs 36.7% (OR 1.05, 95%CI 0.86-1.21)). There was a significant increase in deliveries occurring after 41 weeks (4.7% vs 6.9% (OR 1.83, 95%CI 1.00-3.34; p¼0.032)). There was no difference in maternal, neonatal, and delivery composites or the outcomes assessed individually. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated significant changes in clinical practice secondary to policy changes and patient behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. As an institution who globally adopted ARRIVE Trial practices, we noted fewer inductions, more women presenting in labor, and more women delivering after 41 weeks. We also noted a shorter length of hospital stay for the mother-baby dyad. Overall, these changes in clinical practice did not affect perinatal outcomes.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.