The study objectives were to analyze the changes in exhaled carbon monoxide (COex) induced by histamine provocation challenge in asthmatic patients and to evaluate the relationship between COex and airway sensitivity and reactivity. Levels of COex were measured in 105 nonsmoking mildly asthmatic subjects before and after histamine provocation challenge. Dose-response curves were characterized by their sensitivity (PD20) and reactivity. Dose-response slope (DRS), continuous index of responsiveness (CIR), and bronchial reactivity index (BRI) were determined as reactivity indices. Bronchial challenge was positive for 47 subjects and negative for 58. The COex levels rose significantly after bronchial challenge in the positive response group (4.49 +/- 0.4 vs. 5.74 +/- 0.57 ppm, p = 0.025) and in the negative response group (2.84 +/- 0.25 vs. 4.00 +/- 0.41 ppm, p = 0.000). An inverse relation between basal COex and PD20 was found (r = -0.318, p = 0.030). In all subjects, a proportional direct relationship between COex and DRS (r = 0.214, p = 0.015), CIR (r = 0.401, p = 0.000), and BRI (r = 0.208, p = 0.012) was observed. On stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, COex only significantly correlated with CIR (multiple r2 = 0.174, p = 0.000). In conclusion, exhaled CO determination is a noninvasive inflammatory marker of the respiratory tract, which shows an acceptable association with airway hyperresponsiveness.

We examined the usefulness of some bronchial reactivity indices to identify bronchial asthma in patients with airway hyperresponsiveness. Eighty-eight consecutive patients with positive response to histamine bronchial challenge (> or = 20% fall in FEV1) were included in the study. Dose-response curves were characterised by their sensitivity (PD20) and reactivity. Dose-response slope, continuous index of responsiveness (CIR) and bronchial reactivity index (BRI) with respect to baseline and post-diluent baseline values were determined as reactivity indices. The clinical diagnosis remaining in the case history 2 years after the bronchial challenge was considered the definitive diagnosis. Asthmatic patients had higher baseline BRI (12.121+/-0.412 vs. 11.615+/-0.201; P<0.001) and post-diluent baseline BRI (12.054+/-0.368 vs. 11.563+/-0.531; P = 0.003) than other subjects. Area beneath their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 82.68% (standard error: 0.77) for the baseline BRI and 81.73 (standard error: 0.76). By multiple logistic regression analysis, baseline BRI was the only independent variable identified as a predictor for diagnosis of bronchial asthma (r = 0.387, P = 0.0007). A cut-off of 11.76 for baseline BRI reached an 87.2% sensitivity and an 80% specificity for bronchial asthma diagnosis. In conclusion, BRI calculated with respect to baseline FEV1 should be useful in identifying asthmatic patients among subjects with airway hyperresponsiveness.