Surveillance of CDNK2A mutation carriers is relatively successful, detecting most PDACs at a resectable stage. The benefit of surveillance in families with FPC is less evident.
BackgroundPancreatic cancer remains one of the most difficult cancers to treat with the poorest prognosis. The key to improving survival rates in this disease is early detection and monitoring of disseminated and residual disease. However, this is hindered due to lack reliable diagnostic and predictive markers which mean that the majority of patients succumb to their condition within a few months.MethodsWe present a pilot study of the detection circulating free DNA (cfDNA) combined with tumor specific mutation detection by digital PCR as a novel minimally invasive biomarker in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This was compared to the detection of CTC by the CellSearch® system and a novel CTC enrichment strategy based on CD45 positive cell depletion. The aim of the study was to assess tumor specific DNA detection in plasma and CTC detection as prognostic markers in PDAC.ResultsWe detected KRAS mutant cfDNA in 26 % of patients of all stages and this correlated strongly with Overall Survival (OS), 60 days (95 % CI: 19–317) for KRAS mutation positive vs 772 days for KRAS mutation negative (95 % CI: 416–1127). Although, the presence of CTC detected by the CellSearch® system did correlate significantly with OS, 88 days (95 % CI: 27–206) CTC positive vs 393 days CTC negative (95 % CI: 284–501), CTC were detected in only 20 % of patients, the majority of which had metastatic disease, whereas KRAS mutant cfDNA was detected in patients with both resectable and advanced disease.ConclusionsTumor specific cfDNA detection and CTC detection are promising markers for the management of patients with PDAC, although there is a need to validate these results in a larger patient cohort and optimize the detection of CTC in PDAC by applying the appropriate markers for their detection.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1779-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
The volvulus of the small bowel is a surgical emergency, causing small bowel obstruction. We performed a retrospective study of all the patients diagnosed and treated with small bowel volvulus between 1977 and 2007 at our institution. One hundred twenty-nine patients were analyzed. Thirty-nine patients presented primary volvulus and 90 secondary ones. The most frequent symptom was sudden abdominal pain. CT scan was the best diagnostic method with an accuracy of 83 per cent. Necrotic small bowel loops appeared in 46.5 per cent of the patients. Eighteen patients had postoperative complications (14%). Mortality rate was 9.3 per cent. A higher mortality is observed among patients with previous abdominal surgeries and cardiopathies. Necrotic loops are associated with higher mortality and incidence of surgical complications; patients with diabetes are associated with a higher incidence of necrotic loops. Cardiopathies are associated with more frequent medical and surgical complications. Recurrence rate was 3.9 per cent associated with simple devolvulation. Primary volvulus are more frequent among males and patients with diabetes. Jejunal location is associated with primary volvulus and these correlate with a higher incidence of necrotic loops. Primary volvulus presents a higher incidence of surgical complications. A bowel obstruction with sudden abdominal pain must be suspicious of small bowel volvulus. The main aim is to achieve an early diagnosis to prevent a necrotic small bowel. CT scan is the imaging test with the best diagnostic accuracy. Primary volvulus, the presence of necrotic loops, and patients with cardiopathies, diabetes mellitus, and with previous abdominal surgery are associated with a worse outcome.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.