Ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) copolymer foams with addition of 1.0, 2.5, and 5 wt% of carbon nanomaterials (graphene, graphene oxide, carbon nanotubes, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes) were fabricated. Properties of these foams were compared with reference sample (no additives) and samples containing carbon black. The following properties of these samples were examined: density, compressive stress (50% compression), impact behavior, thermal conductivity, and hydrophobicity. The morphology was studied using scanning electron microscopy. The samples were additionally characterized using thermal gravimetric analysis and differential scanning calorimetry.Increasing weight percentage of carbon-based additives led to foam structure with lower porosity and higher density. Samples with a higher degree of cross-linking were less dense ($10%) as compared to the reference sample and also displayed better mechanical and thermal properties. Increasing weight percentages of additives led to higher compressive strength and higher energy absorption. Samples with 5 wt% of additives and increased quantity of cross-linking agent exhibited great mechanical properties. Despite their lower density, these samples had higher values of compressive stress, 10%-15% higher than those of the reference sample, and higher energy return properties. All samples follow the trend of increasing values of compressive strength with the increase in density, for some samples, this correlation has quasi linear character. The obtained results show that EVA foams with the addition of carbon black, graphene, carbon nanotubes, and multiwalled carbon nanotubes have properties desirable in high-performance materials for sport footwear soles. Multiwalled carbon nanotube additives could be incorporated at low weight percentages and low degree of crosslinking into EVA matrix to achieve lower density and enhanced energy repulsion and cushioning effects.
Samples of ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) co‐polymer foams in form of plates and industrial outsoles of prototyped sport shoes containing 0% (reference), 2.5%, and 5.0 weight % (wt%) of hollow glass microspheres (HGM) were made. The goal was to study the influence of HGM on properties of EVA foam in laboratory conditions followed by the industrial trial, where the most promising laboratory result was applied. The physical properties of samples and behavior of material under dynamic load were examined. EVA foams with HGM filler demonstrated that they have better ability to reduce impact peak force and increase absorb impact impulse compared to the reference foam without HGM. Addition of 5.0 wt% of HGM in laboratory foam increased its absorbed impact pulse by two‐fold. Meanwhile for industrial prototype outsoles, the impact peak force was reduced by 5%–7% in walking simulated conditions and by 11% in case of simulated running. It is also observed that, addition of 5.0 wt% of HGM in EVA foam increased its abrasion resistance by three times, which generally helps to increase the lifetime of sport footwear. Under dynamic load, samples with the addition of HGM behave interestingly and result shows a small decrease in energy return (7%) which is logical, because this composite tends to absorb energy and not return it. Samples with 2.5 wt% HGM are stiffer than reference until 40% compression deformation, but beyond that point it becomes softer, and better absorbs impact energy than reference. Outsole with 2.5% of HGM in EVA outsole increased resistance of shoe at lateral bending of 50% and 20% rise of resistance was found at medial twist. Impact absorption and flexibility resistance are useful for protection against impact which are also helpful to prevent sport injuries. The obtained results show the addition of HGMs which are cheap by‐products in several technologies brings improvement to properties of EVA foams which is the most common materials for the sport footwear industry.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.