No abstract

No abstract

Multispectral imaging using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) has changed the pace of precision agriculture. Actual evapotranspiration (ETa) from the very high spatial resolution of UAV images over agricultural fields can help farmers increase their production at the lowest possible cost. ETa estimation using UAVs requires a full package of sensors capturing the visible/infrared and thermal portions of the spectrum. Therefore, this study focused on a multi-sensor data fusion approach for ETa estimation (MSDF-ET) independent of thermal sensors. The method was based on sharpening the Landsat 8 pixels to UAV spatial resolution by considering the relationship between reference ETa fraction (ETrf) and a Vegetation Index (VI). Four Landsat 8 images were processed to calculate ETa of three UAV images over three almond fields. Two flights coincided with the overpasses and one was in between two consecutive Landsat 8 images. ETrf was chosen instead of ETa to interpolate the Landsat 8-derived ETrf images to obtain an ETrf image on the UAV flight. ETrf was defined as the ratio of ETa to grass reference evapotranspiration (ETr), and the VIs tested in this study included the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), Soil Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), and Land Surface Water Index (LSWI). NDVI performed better under the study conditions. The MSDF-ET-derived ETa showed strong correlations against measured ETa, UAV- and Landsat 8-based METRIC ETa. Also, visual comparison of the MSDF-ET ETa maps was indicative of a promising performance of the method. In sum, the resulting ETa had a higher spatial resolution compared with thermal-based ETa without the need for the Albedo and hot/cold pixels selection procedure. However, wet soils were poorly detected, and in cases of continuous cloudy Landsat pixels the long interval between the images may cause biases in ETa estimation from the MSDF-ET method. Generally, the MSDF-ET method reduces the need for very high resolution thermal information from the ground, and the calculations can be conducted on a moderate-performance computer system because the main image processing is applied on Landsat images with coarser spatial resolutions.

No abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ET 0 ) from FAO-Penman-Monteith equation is highly sensitive to the surface incoming solar radiation (SISR) and therefore accurate estimate of this parameter would result in more accurate estimation of ET 0 . In this study, the accuracy of three main approaches for SISR estimation including empirical models (Angstrom and Hargreaves-Samani), physically-based data assimilation models (Global Land Data Assimilation System-Noah, GLDAS/Noah, and National Centers of Environmental Predictions/National Center for Atmospheric Research, NCEP/NCAR), and a satellite observation model (Satellite Application Facility on Climate Monitoring, CM-SAF) were evaluated using ground-based measurements from 2012 to 2015. Then SISR outputs from introduced approaches were implemented in FAO-Penman-Monteith equation for ET 0 estimation on daily and monthly basis. The Angstrom calibrated model was the most accurate model with a coefficient of determination (R 2 ) of 0.9 and standard error of estimate (SEE) of 2.58 MJ. m −2 . d −1 , and GLDAS/Noah, Hargreaves-Samani, NCEP/NCAR, and CM-SAF, had lower accuracy, respectively. However, the lack of the meteorological data and required empirical coefficients are the main limitations of applying the empirical models, however, satellite-based approaches are more practical for operational purposes. The results indicated that, in spite of slight overestimation in warm months, GLDAS/Noah model had better performance with R 2 =0.87 and SEE = 3.5 MJ. m −2 . d −1 in case of lack of meteorological data. The accuracy of ET 0 derived from FAO-Penman-Monteith equation was directly depended on the accuracy of SISR estimation. The ET 0 estimation error was related to SISR estimation error with a fourth-degree function and had a linear relationship with SISR error at daily and monthly scales, respectively.