Introduction: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is defined as the cancer of squamous epithelium lining nasopharynx. The single most common culprit of undifferentiated NPC is the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV). Recurrent local-regional or metastatic NPC cannot be treated with repeated chemo-radiotherapy because of poor overall survival and profound effect of these therapies on quality of life. One safer approach is immunotherapy with autologous EBV specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (EBV-CTLS) targeted to the EBV antigens EBNA1, latent membrane protein LMP1, and LMP2 expressed by most NPC tumors. This study aims to review the efficacy and toxicity of adoptive immunotherapy with EBV-CTLS in patients with EBV induced NPC. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science was performed for adoptive immunotherapy in EBV induced NPC patients from inception to May 28, 2020. Out of 604 studies, 07 phase I and II clinical trials were selected for the systematic review. Results: A total of 134 patients (pts) were evaluated out of 157 pts. 56 had a locoregional disease, 63 had distant metastasis, 15 had both locoregional disease as well as distant metastasis, 8 were in remission and disease status was unknown in 5 pts. Li et al. (2015) in their phase I clinical trial on 20 NPC pts with ECOG performance status of <3 after chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) showed overall response rate (ORR) of 95% with complete response (CR) in 19 patients. One patient showed progressive disease (PD). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was observed to be 16 months. Eighteen (90%) pts showed disease-free survival of greater than 12 months after adoptive cell therapy (ACT). Grade (G) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) included leukopenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Phase I/II dose-escalation trial by Louis et al. (2010) on 23 pts showed ORR of 48.7% (20% CR, 13.3% undetermined complete response [Cru], 15.4% PR) among pts with active disease. Eight pts remained in remission while 10 had metastatic disease at the time of infusion. PD was 21.7%, Stable Disease (SD) 13%, and 3 pts (13%) had recurrent disease. The median time to progression was 1059 days with PFS of 65% and 52% at 1 and 2 years respectively while the (Overall Survival) OS was 87% and 70% at 1 year and 2 years respectively. There was a higher risk of disease progression (HR: 3.91, P= 0.015) and decreased overall survival (HR: 5.55, P=0.022) in metastatic disease as compared to locoregional disease. Huang J. et al (2017) conducted a phase I/ II trial in 21 pts with a mean waiting period of 71 days after chemotherapy. Two CTL infusions were given 2 weeks apart. Two pts (9.5%) maintained SD but all other pts (85%) showed PD after 8 weeks follow- up. One patient achieved CR (4.8%). Hence, ORR was 4.8% while median PFS and OS were of 2.2 months and 16.7 months respectively. In a phase II trial, 24 patients completed 6 EBV- CTL therapy cycles after receiving chemotherapy cycles of Gemcitabine and Carboplatin. ORR was observed to be 42.9% (CR 5.7%, PR 31.7%). SD was 20% while PD was 31.4%. Median OS was 29.9 months (95% CI 20.8-39.3) with 1, 2, and 3-year rates being 77.1%, 62.9%, and 37.1 % respectively. Median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 7.4-8.4). All G≥3 AE occurred during chemotherapy. (Chia et al, 2014) Secondino et al. (2011) conducted a phase I/II study in 11 NPC patients who also received chemotherapy consisting of cyclophosphamide and fludarabine. After a mean follow-up of 4 weeks, ORR was 27% (PR 18%, Minor Response [MR] 9%). PD was reported to be 45% and SD 27%. Median PFS at 6 months was 54% (6/11 pts). Only G≥3 AE reported was neutropenia (36%). Phase I/II trial by Comoli et al. (2005) evaluated 10 EBV-related stage IV NPC in progression after CCRT. After receiving two to twenty-three EBV-specific CTLs infusions, 2 patients showed PR (20%), 40% of pts maintained SD and all others showed evidence of PD (40%) at 1-2 months follow up. Median PFS was 6.5 months. Smith et al (2012) in their phase I trial on 14 patients with locoregional and metastatic NPC reported SD 71.4% and PD 28.6% of patients at a median follow up of 1 month. Median OS and PFS were 17.4 months and 4.5 months respectively. No G≥3 AEs were reported. Conclusion : Adoptive Immunotherapy with EBV-CTLS has shown impressive efficacy with improvement in median PFS and OS and a favorable safety profile. Key Words: Adoptive cell therapy, Cytotoxic T lymphocytes, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, Phase I/II clinical trials, Epstein-Barr virus. Disclosures Anwer: Celgene: Research Funding; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

No abstract

Background: Low-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) patients commonly present with anemia and may become blood transfusions dependent upon progression. Luspatercept, a targeted drug for an activin receptor ligand has emerged as new anemia treatment in MDS for patients with ring sideroblasts and the patients with SF3B1 mutation. This systemic review highlights the efficacy of luspatercept in MDS patients whom erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) are not effective. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search using PubMed, Clinical trial.gov, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of science. Our search strategy included MeSH (Medical Subject Headings) terms and keywords for MDS and luspatercept including trade names and generic names from inception to 29 April 2020. Studies were selected according to PRISMA guidelines. The initial screening revealed 240 articles. After excluding review articles, duplicates, and non-relevant articles, finally we included two clinical trials, which reported transfusion independence (TI), an erythroid response (HI-E) in MDS patients with luspatercept. Proportions along with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) were extracted to compute pooled analysis using the 'meta' package by Schwarzer et al. in the R programming language (version 4.0.2) to report the efficacy of luspatercept. We pooled the results of the experimental arms of the two trials using the inverse variance method and logit transformation. Between studies, variance was calculated using DerSimonian-Laird Estimator. Results: A total of 287 patients were enrolled and evaluated in two phases II/III trials. Platzbecker et al and Fenaux et al reported Erythropoietin stimulating agents (ESA) with one median prior line of therapy (n= 148, n=46). Fenaux et al. also reported iron chelation therapy (n=71) as a prior line of therapy. Patients having ring sideroblast positive <15% (n=172) and SF3B mutation were present in 169 evaluable patients. Low-risk MDS (LR-MDS) patients are classified according to IPSS-R criteria, defined as being of very low (n=19), low (n=135), or intermediate-risk (n=44). Platzbecker et al. (2017) studied luspatercept in MDS patients (n=58) in the PACE phase II trial. Fenaux et al. (2020) studied the efficacy of luspatercept in MDS pts (n=219) in the MEDALIST phase III trial. The baseline Erythropoietin (EPO) levels were: levels <200: n=191, level 200-500: n= 81, level >500: n=57 for both studies. The baseline means hemoglobin (Hb) levels were eight before therapy. TI for more than eight weeks was observed in 38% of patients in both the MEDALIST trial and PACE trial. The erythroid response was 53% and 63% in both trials respectively. In a Phase II study, for LR-MDS patients, the overall erythroid response was higher among patients (n= 69%) having ringed sideroblast status (>15% ring sideroblast) and SF3B mutation (n=77%). The mean increase of Hb was observed in 29 out of 46 and 32 out of 41 pts in MEDALIST and PACE trial, respectively. Luspatercept proved to be efficacious in the pooled analysis i.e transfusion independence (TI): 38%, 95% CI 0.31-0.45; p =0.98, I2 = 0%), and erythroid response (HI-E): 54%, 95% CI 0.48-0.62; p=0.22, I2 = 32%) with an increase in mean Hb of 70% 95%: CI 0.59-0.78; I2 = 56%) (Figure 1). CONCLUSION: In patients with low risk MDS positive ringed sideroblast or SF3B1 mutation status shows good responses with luspatercept treatment, with reduced transfusion dependence, and higher erythroid response. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Astellas Pharma: Research Funding; Acetylon Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Speakers Bureau; AbbVie Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.

Introduction Allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (Allo-HSCT) used for the treatment of multiple hematological malignancies requires immunosuppression, that can lead to the reactivation of viruses like EBV, CMV, adenovirus (AdV). These viruses pose a life-threatening risk to an individual like Graft vs Host Disease (GVHD) and other virus-specific complications. Adoptive T cell therapy (ATC) is an approach to treat refractory post-Allo-HSCT transplant viral infections. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of various ATCs being developed against various viruses. Methods A systematic search on PubMed, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, and Web of Science was performed for adoptive immunotherapy in viral infections after stem cell transplantation from inception to May 28, 2020. Out of 604 studies, 13 phase I and II clinical trials were selected for the systematic review. Results A total of 13 studies were included of which two studies included data on the pediatric population (n=13). A total of 335 patients (pts) were enrolled in 13 studies of which 264 were evaluable. CMV Perruccio et al. (2005) in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) assessed the efficacy of ATC against both Aspergillus and CMV after alloSCT. Median follow up (f/u) was six months. For Aspergillus (n=23), 90% and 54% achieved clearance, while for CMV (n=68) 92% and 9% didn't develop CMV reactivation in treatment and control group respectively. Overall Survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rate at two years were 92% and 80% respectively. Smith et al. (2018) (n=21) in a phase I trial studied the transfusion of virus-specific T cells (VST) (n=13) against CMV infection after undergoing alloSCT. After a median f/u of 28 weeks, overall response rate (ORR) was 85%. Bao et al. (2012) (n=10) conducted a study with VST transfusion against CMV infection (n=7). ORR was 85% of which 3 pts who were on immunosuppressive had shown reactivation. Miej et al. (2012) in phase I/II study (n=6) assessed the response of VST against refractory CMV with CR of 100% Neuenhahn et al. (2017) studied a phase I/II prospective trial (n=17) (CMV Seropositive graft donor (D+) 9/17 and CMV Seronegative graft donor (D-) 8/17) with CR of 62% in D+ group. In D- group only 37% developed T cells after Third-Party Donor transfer and only these achieved CR, while pts with no T cell detection in D- group (63%), only one achieved CR. Micklethwaite et al. (2008) did a phase I clinical trial (n=12) of CMV specific T cells given prophylactically. Only four pts showed CMV reactivation. Adenovirus Feucht et al. (2019) performed a phase I/II clinical trial (n=30) of VST against refractory AdV infection. 47% showed CR, 13% with negative blood AdV cleared virus from other sites, 10% showed PR. OS at six months was 71%. Winnie et al. (2018) (n=8) conducted phase I/II RCT among pediatric pts. Median f/u was six months. All patients have shown a decrease in AdV viral load. Qasim et al. (2013) conducted a prospective trial (n=5) among pediatric pts with CR of 60% until six weeks f/u. 20% died due to AdV viremia. Multi-virus CTLs Gerdemann et al. (2013) (n=36) did a clinical trial by infusing multi-virus cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) (n=10), reactive against CMV, EBV, and AdV. CR in 80% of the pts. Muranski et al. (2017) performed a phase I trial (n=9) and infused multi-virus CTLs prophylactically. No AdV, BK, or EBV related disease was observed in any pts while 11% pts had asymptomatic AdV viremia. Only those pts who received steroid therapy had CMV reactivation (44%). Ma et al. (2015) performed a phase I/II RCT with an intervention group (n=19, evaluable=10) and control group (n=33) with an infusion of multi-virus CTLs against CMV, EBV, AdV, and VZV after alloSCT, prophylactically. Pts in the intervention group had no reactivation of EBV, AdV, or VZV. 6 (60%) pts with CMV had reactivation; four before T cell therapy and two in the context of steroid therapy. OS at one year was 89% and 81% in the intervention and control group respectively. Third-Party Donor T-cells Tzannou et al. (2017) (n=37) in a phase II study demonstrated ORR of 92% (95% CI, 78.1% to 98.3%) in various viruses with ORR for BK virus 100%, CMV 94%, Adv 71%, EBV 100% and HHV-6 67%. Conclusion Adoptive T cell therapy for viral infections has shown efficacy in Post- allo-SCT pts who achieved complete clearance of infection in many cases, showed only minimal adverse events, and no major risk for GVHD related to this therapy was noted. Disclosures Anwer: Incyte, Seattle Genetics, Acetylon Pharmaceuticals, AbbVie Pharma, Astellas Pharma, Celegene, Millennium Pharmaceuticals.: Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau.

Introduction Fanconi anemia (FA) is the most common inherited cause of bone marrow failure syndrome, with an incidence of approximately 1 out of 100,000 births per year and a prevalence of 1 in 360 000 live births. Clinical presentation is variable, ranging from classic Fanconi phenotype to absence of somatic abnormalities. Despite advances in understanding disease genetics and pathogenesis, hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the only curative treatment option for FA patients. However, the future risk of solid organ malignancies persists post-transplant. Although outcomes of allogeneic HSCT for FA are improving steadily but remains suboptimal and often limited by donor availability- especially in countries lacking matched unrelated donor registry. For patients lacking a suitable donor, a trial of androgen is considered but is not curative, and around half of patients will not respond. Haploidentical HSCT has been successfully utilized in the management of acquired severe aplastic anemia and hematological malignancies but only limited published literature is available on its use in inherited bone marrow failure syndromes. We conducted this systematic review to explore survival outcomes of FA patients receiving haploidentical HSCT to assess feasibility of this treatment for patients lacking a matched donor. Methods We conducted a literature search on Pubmed, Cochrane, Google Scholar, open grey, and embase databases using the keywords; Haploidentical Transplant and Fanconi anemia. We screened 236 articles according to the Prisma diagram. After thoroughly reading the titles and abstracts, 13 articles were included for data extraction, and results were compiled. Results We analyzed thirteen studies with haploidentical transplant as a treatment for FA, 7 were retrospective, and 6 were prospective. Diagnosis of FA was established by chromosomal breakage analysis and genetic mutation testing. The preferred donor for a haploidentical transplant was a first-degree relative and mother/sibling in most cases. The total number of patients with FA and other disorder who received haploidentical transplants were n=340. The median age at HSCT was 6.7 (0.25-44) years. Two hundred six were male, and 134 were female. The most common conditioning regimen for FA patients was fludarabine, cyclophosphamide, and total body irradiation (TBI) followed by anti-thrombocyte globulin. Mehta. et al. evaluated haploidentical transplant without TBI in the conditioning regimen. The most common regimen to prevent graft versus host disease (GVHD) was cyclosporin and mycophenolate mofetil. Uppulur. R et al., Bonfim. C et al., Thakar. M.S et al. and Ayas, M et al. also used post-transplant cyclophosphamide for in vivo T cell depletion. Zubicaray. J et al and Strocchio. L et al. did not use any post-transplant therapy. Cumulative Overall survival reported was 79.1%. Cumulative acute GVHD was seen in 38.2%, while cumulative chronic GVHD was seen in 18.6% of patients. The most common adverse events were acute and chronic GVHD, Evans syndrome, steroid-induced osteoporosis, and diabetes. Respiratory syncytial virus, pneumonia, candida sepsis reactivation, hemorrhagic cystitis, and mucositis were the most common infections. Conclusion Fanconi anemia is an inherited bone marrow failure syndrome with somatic abnormalities and increased risk of hematological and solid organ malignancies. In FA, allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) has been shown to restore normal hematopoiesis in patients with matched related donor HCT and has shown excellent long-term survival. Currently, limited data is available reporting outcomes of haploidentical HSCT for FA patients. More studies are required to establish safety and efficacy profiles. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Anwer: Allogene Therapeutics: Research Funding; GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding; Janssen pharmaceutical: Honoraria, Research Funding; BMS / Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding.