Background: The detection of a pathogenic variant in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 gene has medical and psychological consequences for both, affected mutation carriers and their relatives. This study analyzed the psychological impact of genetic testing and mutation-positive test result as well as associated family communication processes from the perspective of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers and their family members.Methods: We conducted a two-phase study with explanatory sequential mixed methods design to understand the perspective of psychological process regarding genetic testing more efficiently. First, we analyzed a survey data of 79 carriers of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Second, we conducted focus group interviews of 10 family members to deepen understanding of communication processes in high-risk families.Results: The average age of the BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers was 48 years, 58% had a history of cancer. The majority (64.6%) had general psychological distress independent of cancer diagnosis in the patients’ history. The point prevalence of depression was 16.9%. The main motives for undergoing genetic testing were desire for safety, prevention and risk assessment for the own children. The mutation carriers were satisfied with the decision to undergo genetic testing. Contrary to their subjective perception, the respondents' knowledge about those mutations was moderate. The familial communication was merely partially successful. In contrast to the high rate of disclosure to at-risk relatives (100%), the reported uptake of genetic testing among informed at-risk relatives was low (45.6%). In-depth focus group interviews with 10 family members revealed significant barriers to accessing genetic counseling including anxiety, uncertainty about the benefits of testing and the own cancer risk, particulary among males.Conclusion: The detection of a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation has psychological impact not only on mutation carriers but also on their family members. An adequate knowledge of the genetic background is required to reduce the level of psychological distress and to support the familial communication process. Therefore, the quality of information sources for affected individuals and relatives and also the awareness of health care professionals have to be improved.

Background Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequently diagnosed malignant tumor in men. The potential benefit of a healthy lifestyle contrasts sharply with the observed poor adherence to current international lifestyle guidelines. Thus, well‐designed sustainable interventions of aftercare that can be translated into routine practice are highly recommended. The present pilot study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of a multimodal lifestyle intervention program in PCa patients after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods In a single‐arm study, carried out at the Martini‐Klinik of the University Medical Center Hamburg‐Eppendorf, Germany, 59 eligible men with locally advanced PCa were recruited within 3−6 months after RP and assigned to a multimodal lifestyle program. The program consisted of 10 weekly 6−7 h course days, with a focus on dietary control, physical activity (per World Cancer Research Fund recommendations) and psychological support. Primary objectives were feasibility, acceptability, completion rate, and safety. In addition, changes in lifestyle, psychological well‐being, clinical and laboratory values were assessed. The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (No. DRK S00015288 [MARTINI‐Lifestyle‐cohort] [http://www.germanctr.de]). Results A high program acceptance was observed. Only three participants (5%) dropped out of the program prematurely. Personal feedback reflected appreciation for participation, personal gain through new knowledge and through the group experience. Without exception, all participants have taken part in follow‐up examinations and no adverse events or incidents occurred. In addition, changes in lifestyle habits, clinical parameters and improved quality of life were detected. Conclusion The MARTINI lifestyle program appears feasible and safe, and acceptance of the multimodal intervention was high among PCa patients. These encouraging results favor conducting a large multicenter trial to implement the program into routine practice and to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention on survival and quality of life.