Holm oak (Quercus ilexL.) and Aleppo pine (Pinus halepensisMill) are representative of two different functional types of trees extensively found in the Mediterranean: evergreen sclerophyllous and drought-adapted conifers. The former is considered a partially drought-tolerant species, whereas the latter is a typically drought-avoiding, water-saving species. We postulated that contrasting strategies in response to water deficits in Q. ilex and P. halepensis would lead to a differential sensitivity to changes in water availability. To test this hypothesis, we compared the response of both species in growth rate (measured as radial increments) and intrinsic water use efficiency WUE(i), as inferred from carbon isotope discrimination (Delta(13)C) in wood samples] among sites from different provenance regions in NE Spain. We found significant differences in Delta(13)C and growth among provenance regions, partly explained by contrasting water availability. Wood Delta(13)C was positively related with precipitation and the ratio between precipitation and potential evapotranspiration (P/ E). However, these relationships were stronger in P. halepensis (for P / E, r(2)=0.67, P <0.001) than in Q. ilex ( r(2)=0.42, P <0.01). In addition, radial growth was positively related with precipitation and Delta(13)C in P. halepensis ( r(2)=0.32 and r(2)=0.35, respectively, P <0.01), but not in Q. ilex. We concluded that P. halepensis was more sensitive than Q. ilex to water availability, showing faster increase in WUE(i) in response to water stress. We also found that the effect of north/south aspect on Delta(13)C and growth was site-specific, and unrelated to climatic variables.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.