Declines in northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) populations have led landowners in Texas, USA, to develop various management strategies to combat waning abundance. One common management strategy is to provide supplemental feed to bobwhites, despite the paucity of information regarding the effects of supplemental feed on bobwhite space use and survival. We examined survival and home range of bobwhites using the technique of spreading supplemental feed into roadside vegetation in the Texas Rolling Plains. The study sites were divided into 8 (404.6-ha) units randomly designated as treatment (feed provided) or control (feed withheld). Treatment and control units were rotated during the second field season to minimize potential habitat bias. Treatment units received approximately 69.1 kg/km of milo (Sorghum bicolor) twice per month. We captured and radiomarked 197 female bobwhites (82 treatment [48: 2010-2011; 34: 2011-2012], 115 control [64: 2010-2011; 51: 2011-2012]) from autumn 2010 to spring 2012. Females were monitored for location and survival with radiotelemetry 3-4 times/week. Average home-range size was similar on control and treatment units (47.6 ha [8.7 SE] and 46.2 ha [10.3 SE], respectively). We estimated survival rate with the nest survival model in Program MARK. We observed an increase in survival rate on treatment units compared with control units, regardless of year or environmental conditions. Our results suggest that distributing supplemental feed into roadside vegetation positively influences bobwhite survival with no reduction in home range size. Ó 2015 The Wildlife Society.
For federally listed species such as Least Tern Sternula antillarum and Piping Plover Charadrius melodus, correct determination of nest fates and causes of nest failure is crucial for understanding population dynamics and improving monitoring programmes. We used video cameras to evaluate nest fate misclassification rate and to identify factors that may cause researchers monitoring nests at different intervals to classify Least Tern and Piping Plover nest fates incorrectly. During the 2013-2015 breeding seasons, we installed miniature surveillance cameras at 65 of 294 Least Tern and 89 of 551 Piping Plover nests under observation on the Missouri River in North Dakota. Nest fates were assigned in the field from remains found at the nest-site and then again by an independent researcher who reviewed camera footage. We used ordinal logistic regressions to examine whether monitoring interval, clutch age or temporal factors influenced a correct, partially misclassified (probable successful in the field vs. successful by camera) or misclassified nest fate classification. During a 7-day monitoring interval between visits, 45% of nests were partially and 27.5% were fully misclassified. The percentage of partially (20%) and fully (8.0%) misclassified nests decreased with a more intensive (3-day) monitoring schedule. Researchers were also less likely to correctly classify nest fates for Least Terns than for Piping Plovers, and as clutch age and monitoring interval increased for both species. Furthermore, causes of failure (e.g. predators, weather) as determined from field evidence vs. video disagreed for 53.5% of nests. The ability to identify accurately nest fate and cause of nest failure will facilitate a better understanding of factors that limit productivity and will lead to better informed management decisions for improving nest survival.Nest survival is a crucial demographic parameter used to understand the underlying factors that influence population size and viability over time.Additionally, in many circumstances nest survival is more straightforward to measure than most other significant traits of life history; therefore, it is often more feasible for research and management than many of the other vital rates that are important to productivity (Johnson 2007). It is no surprise that the issue of estimating nest survival has received considerable attention in the past and at present, suggesting that there are still unresolved † Present address: Bureau of Land Management,
There is a paucity of information concerning northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) chick demography caused by a deficiency of efficient published capture techniques and permanent unique markers for identification. In order to facilitate chick research, we employed a thermal camera to detect and capture chicks during the preflight stage (≤14 days old) brooded by a radiomarked female. We released a known number of chicks into native vegetation within a flight pen to test this technique. Observers (unaware of the number) then used a thermal camera to successfully count (≥95% intra‐class correlation coeff.; complete counts for each age class) and capture the chicks. In separate field tests, we homed to within 10 m of the roost location of wild radiomarked females before sunrise, circled the area until the brood heat signature was observed, and flushed the female from the chicks. We located 116 chicks from 43 broods with the thermal camera throughout the 2011 nesting season with 81% complete, 12% partial, and 7% failed captures attempts. Detection of chicks by the thermal camera was not affected by age. Complete brood abandonment was not detected as a result of capture events. The employment of a thermal camera to capture chicks should advance the success and efficiency of capture and thus promote research concerning brood ecology. © 2012 The Wildlife Society.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.