A major emphasis in the evaluation of swallowing is to identify physiological abnormalities in swallowing that contribute to or explain unsafe swallowing (i.e., ingested material enters the trachea; post-swallow residue in the pharynx). Impairments in laryngeal vestibule closure are widely recognized as one of the major causes of unsafe swallowing, as it is the primary mechanism and first line of defense for preventing material from penetrating the airway during swallowing. However, this complex mechanism is often overlooked and understudied in swallowing research and dysphagia management. The purpose of this review is to promote a better understanding of the mechanism of laryngeal vestibule closure. We discuss where gaps in research exist and propose future directions for incorporating laryngeal vestibule closure as a primary outcome measure in swallowing research. Additionally, we propose that an increased knowledge of the mechanism of laryngeal vestibule closure will increase diagnostic accuracy and optimize dysphagia management for patients with dysphagia.
This study provides important contributions to the literature by clarifying normal variability within a wide range of swallowing behaviors and by providing normative data from which to compare disordered populations.
Swallowing dysfunction is common after stroke. More than 50% of the 665
thousand stroke survivors will experience dysphagia acutely of which
approximately 80 thousand will experience persistent dysphagia at 6 months. The
physiologic impairments that result in post-stroke dysphagia are varied. This
review focuses primarily on well-established dysphagia treatments in the context
of the physiologic impairments they treat. Traditional dysphagia therapies
including volume and texture modifications, strategies such as chin tuck, head
tilt, head turn, effortful swallow, supraglottic swallow, super-supraglottic
swallow, Mendelsohn maneuver and exercises such as the Shaker exercise and
Masako (tongue hold) maneuver are discussed. Other more recent treatment
interventions are discussed in the context of the evidence available.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.