When designing sound evaluation experiments, researchers rely on listening test methods, such as rating scales (RS). This work aims to investigate the suitability of best-worst scaling (BWS) for the perceptual evaluation of sound qualities. To do so, 20 participants rated the “brightness” of a corpus of instrumental sounds (N = 100) with RS and BWS methods. The results show that BWS procedure is the fastest and that RS and BWS are equivalent in terms of performance. Interestingly, participants preferred BWS over RS. Therefore, BWS is an alternative method that reliably measures perceptual sound qualities and could be used in many-sounds paradigm.
When designing sound evaluation experiments, researchers rely on listening test methods, such as rating scales (RS). In this work, we investigated the suitability of best-worst scaling (BWS) — a relative judgment method — for the perceptual evaluation of sound qualities. To do so, 20 participants rated the ‘brightness’ of a corpus of instrumental sounds (N=100) with RS and BWS methods. Our results show that BWS is equivalent to RS in terms of performance, participants’ impression, and duration. Interestingly, participants preferred the BWS over RS. Therefore, BWS is an alternative that reliably measure perceptual sound qualities and could be used in many-sounds paradigm.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.