Due to its low density, high specific strength, and resource availability, magnesium and its alloys, such as AZ91, have a high potential for various lightweight applications. [1][2][3] A major hindrance for its widespread processing and use is its high reactivity, contributing to high dross-and sludge formation in the melt, which results in the metal being prone to corrosion and containing high quantities of nonmetallic inclusions, if the handling of the melt has not been accurate. The inclusions can be divided into oxide films, lumps, and clusters, as well as intermetallic particles; gas-and shrinkage pores, may also be present. [1][2][3][4][5] While measures are taken to protect and cleanse magnesium melts on industrial scale, such as gas purging treatments by Ar, N 2 , or Cl 2 , the usage of a variety of possible cover gases or fluxes and the optimization of the casting system toward a high grade of enclosure, [1,6] the application of ceramic foam filters is seen as a promising method for cleansing the melt and improving the mechanical properties of the casting. [7][8][9] Ideally, an auxiliary addition of fluxes would be avoided, while delivering the same quality of melt cleanliness. [10][11][12] Wu et al. emphasized the effectiveness of ceramic foam filters made from MgO or Al 2 O 3 in AZ91, improving the elongation-to-failure of cast samples up to relative 58%. [13] In contrast to oxidic, sintered filters, carbon-bonded ceramic foam filters show higher resistance toward thermal shock and creep deformation, as well as lower energy consumption during their manufacture, due to their lower manufacturing temperature. [14] After carbon-bonded alumina filters showed promising results in the filtration of steel melts, [15] short-term immersion tests in AZ91 have been carried out to evaluate their applicability in a magnesium alloy melt. Interface reactions between the AZ91 melt and variously coated ceramic Al 2 O 3 -C filters have been investigated after immersion times of 10-120 s. [16] The investigated filter coatings consisted of Al 2 O 3 , MgO-C, MgAl 2 O 4 , or carbon nanotubes/ alumina nanosheets. The formation of MgO in situ layers was shown on filter surfaces containing Al 2 O 3 or MgAl 2 O 4 . [16] Therefore, the next step toward assessing the applicability of oxidic as well as carbon-bonded ceramic foam filters in the field of magnesium melt filtration is the evaluation of their long-term resistance toward the magnesium melt, with a special regard toward melt contamination and inclusion content.In this study, additional ceramic foam filter materials, namely ZrO 2 [13] and MgAlON, [17] were added to the selected materials