Although the influence of nitrogen (N) addition on grassland plant communities has been widely studied, it is still unclear whether observed patterns and underlying mechanisms are constant across biomes. In this systematic review, we use meta-analysis and metaregression to investigate the influence of N addition (here referring mostly to fertilization) upon the biodiversity of temperate mountain grasslands (including montane, subalpine and alpine zones). Forty-two studies met our criteria of inclusion, resulting in 134 measures of effect size. The main general responses of mountain grasslands to N addition were increases in phytomass and reductions in plant species richness, as observed in lowland grasslands. More specifically, the analysis reveals that negative effects on species richness were exacerbated by dose (ha(-1) year(-1) ) and duration of N application (years) in an additive manner. Thus, sustained application of low to moderate levels of N over time had effects similar to short-term application of high N doses. The climatic context also played an important role: the overall effects of N addition on plant species richness and diversity (Shannon index) were less pronounced in mountain grasslands experiencing cool rather than warm summers. Furthermore, the relative negative effect of N addition on species richness was more pronounced in managed communities and was strongly negatively related to N-induced increases in phytomass, that is the greater the phytomass response to N addition, the greater the decline in richness. Altogether, this review not only establishes that plant biodiversity of mountain grasslands is negatively affected by N addition, but also demonstrates that several local management and abiotic factors interact with N addition to drive plant community changes. This synthesis yields essential information for a more sustainable management of mountain grasslands, emphasizing the importance of preserving and restoring grasslands with both low agricultural N application and limited exposure to N atmospheric deposition.
The response of montane and subalpine hay meadow plant and arthropod communities to the application of liquid manure and aerial irrigation – two novel, rapidly spreading management practices – remains poorly understood, which hampers the formulation of best practice management recommendations for both hay production and biodiversity preservation. In these nutrient-poor mountain grasslands, a moderate management regime could enhance overall conditions for biodiversity. This study experimentally assessed, at the site scale, among low-input montane and subalpine meadows, the short-term effects (1 year) of a moderate intensification (slurry fertilization: 26.7–53.3 kg N·ha−1·year−1; irrigation with sprinklers: 20 mm·week−1; singly or combined together) on plant species richness, vegetation structure, hay production, and arthropod abundance and biomass in the inner European Alps (Valais, SW Switzerland). Results show that (1) montane and subalpine hay meadow ecological communities respond very rapidly to an intensification of management practices; (2) on a short-term basis, a moderate intensification of very low-input hay meadows has positive effects on plant species richness, vegetation structure, hay production, and arthropod abundance and biomass; (3) vegetation structure is likely to be the key factor limiting arthropod abundance and biomass. Our ongoing experiments will in the longer term identify which level of management intensity achieves an optimal balance between biodiversity and hay production.
In the drier regions of the European Alps, traditional land-use of montane and subalpine meadows, i.e. extensively managed with solid manure application and irrigation via water channels, is currently shifting towards application of slurry and aerial irrigation. The impact of these new practices upon biodiversity remains poorly understood and calls for quantitative assessments of their effects. Relying on a full block design, we tested the effects of six management treatments corresponding to an increasing gradient of farming intensification (fertilisation with slurry and/or irrigation with sprinklers) on Auchenorrhyncha (Hemiptera) communities occurring in the inner Swiss Alps. The experimental set up consisted of: control plots (no fertiliser, no irrigation; C-plots); plots that received only fertiliser (F-plots); plots that were only irrigated (I-plots); and plots that received low-, medium-and high-input of fertiliser and water (F+I 1/3-plots; F+I 2/3, F+I 3/3-plots; 3/3 corresponds here to the input level necessary for achieving maximum theoretical hay yield locally). After two years of experimental treatment (2012), plots that were only fertilised or only irrigated showed no change in the population sizes of Auchenorrhyncha, while plots that received low-, mediumand high-input of fertiliser and water harboured significantly higher abundances (1.9, 1.5 and 1.4 times higher, respectively), biomass (1.8, 1.6 and 1.8 times higher, respectively), as well as species richness (+27-30%, on average) than control plots. Abundances and species richness were also higher in plots with low-input of fertiliser and water compared to fertilised only plots. Monophagous and oligophagous species were most abundant in plots with lowinput of fertiliser and water. Medium-and high-input treatments (F+I 2/3 and 3/3) increased the number of generalist (eurytopic) species, while only low-input treatment (F+I 1/3) boosted the more specialised (stenotopic) species. This provides support to the hump-shaped diversitydisturbance relationship and guidance for sustainable management of biodiversity-rich mountain hay meadows. Intensivierungsgrade (F+I 2/3 und F+I 3/3) führten zudem zu einer Förderung der (eurtytopen) Generalisten, während sich niedrige Dosen an Dünger und Wasser (F+I 1/3) positiv auf spezialisierte (stenotope) Arten auswirkten. Dieser Befund bestätigt die Theorie einer glockenförmig verlaufenden Beziehungskurve zwischen biologischer Diversität und Bewirtschaftungsintensität und eröffnet Möglichkeiten für eine nachhaltige Bewirtschaftung von artenreichen Heuwiesen im Berggebiet.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.