ResumoNeste artigo apresentaremos os resultados de uma pesquisa que tem como objetivo comparar apostilas e livros didáticos de Matemática do Ensino Médio, enfocando, a partir da teoria crítica de currículo (SILVA, 2011), conteúdos, sequências e objetivos de ensino expressos nestes materiais. Coloca-se como hipótese a dualidade do Ensino Médio no Brasil, propedêutico ou profissional, a qual estará expressa também no material didático. As análises revelaram que, apesar do livro didático aparentemente possuir a estrutura e abordagem de conteúdo diferentes das apostilas, os materiais se assemelham nos conteúdos, na sequência deles e na organização disciplinar, o que indica que as novas tendências do ensino, preconizadas no PCN e PNLD-EM, estão superficialmente expressas nos livros didáticos. A hipótese da dualidade se confirma pelo excesso de exercícios nas apostilas, recorrentes "chamadas" e referências a vestibulares, o que remete a um tipo de condicionamento.Palavras-chave: Livros Didáticos. Apostilas. Currículo de Matemática. Ensino Propedêutico ou Profissional. AbstractIn this paper we present the results of an analysis that compared high school textbooks and workbooks, emphasizing the critical curricular theories (SILVA, 2011) and the teaching objectives expressed in these materials. Our hypothesis is the High School ambiguity in Brazil, propaedeutic or professional, which would also be expressed in the learning materials. Although, apparently, both materials have different structures and content approaches, the analysis pointed out several similarities in the presented contents, in the sequence and in the disciplinary organization. These similarities indicate that the new teaching proposals suggested by the PCN and PNLD-EM are being superficially adopted by the textbooks. The initial hypothesis confirms itself by the excess of exercises in the workbooks and the constant reference to college's admission examinations that suggests a type of conditioning procedure.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.