The prevalence of GBV-C infection in voluntary blood donors and in groups at high risk for parenteral exposure to infectious agents was studied. The high risk groups included chronic renal failure patients on haemodialysis, renal transplant patients and haemophiliacs from Gauteng. The presence of GBV-C RNA in these populations was determined using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) in the 5' non-coding region (NCR) of the virus. Of the blood donors, 11.1% (95% CI 7.6, 15.8) were positive, whereas 23.8% (95% CI 12.6, 40.2) of haemodialysis patients and 23.5% (95% CI 15.9, 33.3) of the haemophiliacs were infected with GBV-C. The highest proportion of infection was in the renal transplant patients, where 41.2% (95% CI 35.1, 47.7) were found to have circulating GBV-C RNA. Serological markers for hepatitis B (HBV) and hepatitis C viruses (HCV) were also measured as indicators of other hepatitis viruses with important parenteral transmission routes. Of the GBV-C positive blood donors, 3.6% were also HBsAg positive and none were positive for HCV. The GBV-C positive patients on haemodialysis were not positive for either HBsAg or antibodies to HCV, but had evidence of past infection with HBV since 40% were anti-HBc positive. The greatest proportion of HCV positives was in the haemophiliac group, 91.3%, none of these were HBsAg positive but 39.1% had anti-HBc. In the GBV-C positive renal transplant patients, 4% had HBsAg, 13.3% had anti-HBc and 2.1% had antibodies to HCV. This is the first report describing the prevalence of GBV-C in South African populations.

HIV-1 subtype C accounts for the vast majority of infections in South Africa. However, increasingly non-C subtypes are being detected. Here we report 10 viruses that contain sequences that group with subtypes A, D, and G as well as CRF02_AG and 1 that could not be classified. Most of these individuals were from other countries in Africa. Some of these sequences were in combination with subtype C, possibly indicating local recombination events. Although there is no indication of endemic spread of these viruses, continued monitoring is warranted to track genetic changes, which may impact on diagnostic testing, therapeutic responses to antiretroviral therapies, and vaccine design.