No abstract

One-day-of-age broiler chickens were administered a commercial competitive exclusion (CE) product and then challenged by three different methods with an Escherichia coli O78:K80 that was pathogenic for poultry and resistant to six antibiotics. Three challenge methods were used on 2-day-old broilers: direct challenge, precolonized seeder, and instant seeder. Direct challenge was accomplished by administering the challenge E. coli per os. The precolonized seeder challenge had two chicks that had received the challenge E. coli 24 hr previously, whereas the instant seeder challenge had two chicks given the challenge E. coli per os with immediate placement with the experimental birds. One oral dose of the commercial CE product significantly reduced the colonization of the small intestine, large intestine, and ceca by the highly antimicrobial resistant poultry pathogenic E. coli O78:K80 at 7 and 14 days postchallenge by all three challenge methods. The overall mean reductions in colonization were 3.0 log10 for the large intestine, 3.0 log10 for the small intestine, and 4.0 log10 for the cecum. The most severe challenge method, on the basis of the least amount of reduction of colonization of the challenge E. coli by the CE, was by the direct oral gavage at 2 days of age.

6507 Background: TPExtreme trial comparing EXTREME regimen to the taxane-based TPEx confirmed the encouraging survival results of the TPEx regimen, despite lack of significant overall survival (OS) increase, with a significantly lower toxicity than the EXTREME regimen. Herein, the QoL and exploratory analyses of survival according to 2nd line treatments focusing on immunotherapy (IO) are presented. Methods: Randomized (1:1), open-label trial. Main inclusion criteria were R/M HNSCC not suitable for loco-regional treatment, age 18-70 years, PS < 2, creatinin clearance > 60ml/min, prior cisplatin < 300 mg/m². 539 pts were enrolled over a period of 37 months (mo). QoL was evaluated with QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline, week(W)12, W18, W26 and analyzed by linear mixed model. The primary QoL endpoint was the Global Health Status score. 2nd line treatments were collected for 501 (93%) patients (pts), 256 in the EXTREME arm and 245 in the TPEx arm. Results: The percentage of QLQ-C30 questionnaires filled at baseline, W12, W18 and W26 were similar in the 2 arms, 89%, 52%, 43%, and 39% in the EXTREME arm and 91%, 59%, 40%, and 37% in the TPEx arm, respectively.. Higher scores of Global Health Status (p = 0.02), physical functioning (p = 0.009) and role functioning (p = 0.013) and lower scores of appetite loss (p = 0.041) were observed in the TPEx arm than in the EXTREME arm. No significant difference was observed for the other scores. In 2nd line treatment, 120 (47%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 109 (44%) in the TPEx arm received chemotherapy +/- cetuximab (CT); 41 (16%) pts in the EXTREME arm and 41 (17%) in the TPEx arm received IO, mainly anti-PD-1/PD-L1. 79% and 85% of these 2nd line treatments were given after progression in EXTREME and TPEx arms respectively. Median OS (95%CI) since randomization was 17.6 (15.2 – 19.5) mo with CT and 19.4 (13.4 – 22.3) mo with IO in the EXTREME arm vs 14.9 (13.0 – 16.3) and 21.9 (15.9 – 35.0) mo in the TPEx arm (interaction test p = 0.077) respectively. Median OS since start of 2nd line was 9.3 mo with CT and 8.3 mo with IO in the EXTREME arm, and 7.1 and 11.6 mo respectively in the TPEx arm. Conclusions: An improvement in the QoL of patients was observed in the TPEx arm compared to that of the EXTREME arm. Exploratory analysis showed that the taxane-based TPEx regimen followed by IO in 2nd line could provide interesting median OS for pts who need CT in 1st line, with less toxicity than EXTREME. This sequential treatment deserves to be compared to a strategy that starts with Platinum+5FU+pembrolizumab. Clinical trial information: NCT02268695 .

No abstract

Poly(ADP-ribose)polymerase (PARP) inhibitors are targeted therapy for cancers with homologous repair deficiency (HRD). They were first approved for ovarian cancer and have changed current treatment strategies. They have also demonstrated efficacy in HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer and advanced prostate cancer with BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. Patients with somatic and/or germline BRCA1/2 mutations benefit more from these treatments than other patients. Nowadays, the diagnosis of HRD is largely based on germline genetic testing, which is performed after an in-person genetic counseling session, even for patients without any family history of cancer. However, with the increasing number of PARP inhibitor indications across different tumor types, rapid access to oncogenetic consultations will become a challenge. To meet this demand, tumor genomic testing could be offered at initial diagnosis. Telephone counseling and other referral systems could replace in-person consultations for certain subgroups of patients deemed to have a low risk of harboring a germline mutation. This article reviews international guidelines for genetic counseling testing. We herein propose new care pathways for breast, prostate and ovarian cancers, including tumor genomic testing at initial diagnosis in order to help triage genetic counseling referrals.