Ertapenem half-life was prolonged in hemodialysis patients. Considering the nonrenal clearance and the expected 70% removal with high-efficacy hemodialysis, the dose of 1 g ertapenem, three times weekly, after hemodialysis may produce pharmacodynamically sufficient exposure for potential antimicrobial efficacy. Further studies are warranted to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of this dose with prolonged duration of therapy.
Objective. To validate a problem-based learning (PBL) evaluation checklist to assess individual Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) students' performance in a group. Methods. In 2013, a performance checklist was developed and standardized. To evaluate the reliability and discriminant validity of the checklist, pharmacy students' evaluation scores from 2015-2016 were assessed along with overall program grade point averages (GPA), and scores on knowledge and problem-solving examinations. Predictive analysis software was used to analyze the data. Results. Seventy facilitators generated 1506 evaluation reports for 191 (90 third-year and 101 secondyear) students over eight PBL cases. The mean (SD) total score was 40.6 (2.5) for P3s and 39.1 (2.7) for P2s out of a possible 44.2 points. Students' scores improved each semester. Interrater reliability based on intraclass correlation coefficient for all cases was 0.67. Internal reliability as determined by Cronbach alpha was .0.7 for all binary checklist items across all cases. Discriminant validity assessed using Pearson correlation coefficient showed that the total score from the checklist did not correlate with knowledge or problem-solving examination scores. Conclusion. This unique PBL checklist proved to be a reliable and valid tool to assess student performance in small group sessions in a PharmD curriculum.
Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose To describe insulin adjustments made following initiation of glucagon-like peptide 1 agonist (GLP1a) or sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy in patients within a primary care setting. Methods This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic health system. Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus initiated on a GLP1a or SGLT2i while on insulin and managed by an ambulatory care pharmacist were included. The primary endpoint was the percent change in total daily insulin dose at specified time points (2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months) after agent initiation. The secondary endpoints included a glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) value of less than 8%, change from baseline HbA1c, and safety profiles of GLP1a therapy and SGLT2i therapy. Results Of the 150 patients included, 123 were initiated on a GLP1a and 27 on an SGLT2i. After 6 months, GLP1a initiation had resulted in a mean 23.5% decrease (P < 0.001) in insulin dosage and SGLT2i resulted in a mean 0.2% increase (P = 0.20). Insulin dosage reduction with GLP1a use was significantly different between baseline and each time point (P < 0.001). About 72% of patients initiated on a GLP1a and 59% of those initiated on an SGLT2i achieved an HbA1c value of less than 8%. The mean absolute change from baseline in HbA1c concentration was –1.7% with GLP1a use and –1.5% with SGLT2i use (P < 0.001 for both comparisons with baseline values). Hypoglycemia occurred in 21% of patients on a GLP1a and 11% of those on an SGLT2i. Conclusion After GLP1a initiation, the mean total daily insulin dose decreased by 23.5%; after SGLT2i initiation, insulin requirements increased by a mean of 0.2%. These results will help guide insulin adjustments after initiation of these medications.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.