SummaryNine patients with chronic posterior endogenous uveitis of varying aetiology, not satisfactorily controlled with systemic corticosteroids alone, were treated with low dose oral Cyclosporin A (mean maintenance dose 4.0 ± 1.1 mg/kg/day). Six of the nine patients also continued to receive oral prednisolone (15 mg/day or less). During a follow up period of 6-30 (mean 17) months, seven have shown sustained visual improvement. Nephrotoxicity was the major side effect with serum creatinine con centration (mean ± ISD) rising from 91±7 I-lmoIlI to 115± 13l-lmol/1 (0.01
Immunological abnormalities in endogenous posterior uveitis are widely reported but difficult to verify. We have therefore studied several immunological parameters in 14 patients with chronic posterior uveitis and compared the results with 14 healthy controls. Both the general immune status and the specific immune responsiveness to retinal S-antigen have been investigated. Results for the patient group as a whole were not significantly different from the control group. However the patients with severe eye disease (n = 4) had a reduced proliferative response to streptokinase-streptodornase antigen and two further individuals showed a general deficiency in functional cell mediated immunity. Circulating T-helper cells were marginally but not significantly reduced in patients. Responsiveness to bovine retinal S-antigen varied to a similar degree in both the patient and control groups. These findings indicate that, although severe uveitis may be associated with functional defects in cellular immunity in certain cases, in general the measurement of immune responsiveness of peripheral blood lymphocytes is unlikely to aid in the diagnosis or management of chronic posterior uveitis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.