What is holding back service design from making a distinct departure from a product-centred to a socio-material human-centred framework? We have a concern for co-designing that is often discussed as a generic method to develop empathetic connections and understandings of people and their contexts. In this use, mastering the craft of co-designing had inadvertently isolated the method from the practitioner, fragmenting its process as a series of static events or a tool for deployment in staged workshops. Contributing to current debates on co-designing and design anthropology, our paper seeks to re-entangle co-designing back into its lived and enacted contexts. We see co-designing as a reflexive, embodied process of discovery and actualisation, and it is an integral, on-going activity of designing services. Co-designing can catalyse a transformative process in revealing and unlocking tacit knowledge, moving people along on a journey to 'make real' what proposed services might be like in the future. Co-designing plays a critical role especially when it involves the very people who are enmeshed in the realisation of the proposed services itself. As such, our case study of a weekend Ordnance Survey Geovation camp pays closer attention to how this took place and discusses the transformative process that was central to it. By taking a phenomenological perspective and building on a seminal anthropologists' work, Tim Ingold, our paper counters the limitations in service design that tends to see its process as a contained series of fixed interactions or systemized process of methods. Through Ingold, we see 'the social world as a tangle of threads or life-paths, ever ravelling here and unravelling there, within which the task for any being is to improvise a way through, and to keep on-going. Lives are bound up in the tangle.' Similarly, we view co-designing as being and becoming, that is constantly transforming and connecting multiple entanglements.

No abstract

This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in selected shrimp aquaculture farms (n = 37) in Kerala, South India and to characterize the isolates using molecular tools. Overall, a low prevalence of ESBL-producers was found in the farms, most likely due to the reduced antibiotic usage in the shrimp farming sector. Out of the 261 samples (77 shrimp and 92 each of water and sediment), 14 (5.4%) tested positive for ESBL-E. coli or ESBL-K. pneumoniae. A total of 32 ESBL-E. coli and 15 ESBL- K. pneumoniae were recovered from these samples. All ESBL isolates were cefotaxime-resistant with minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≥32 μg/ml. Of all isolates, 9 (28.1%) E. coli and 13 (86.7%) K. pneumoniae showed simultaneous resistance to tetracycline, ciprofloxacin, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. PCR analysis identified CTX-M group 1 (blaCTX–M–15) as the predominant ESBL genotype in both E. coli (23, 71.9%) and K. pneumoniae (15, 100%). Other beta-lactamase genes detected were as follows: blaTEM and blaSHV (11 K. pneumoniae), blaCTX–M group 9 (9 E. coli), and blaCMY–2 (2 E. coli). Further screening for AMR genes identified tetA and tetB (13, 40.6%), sul1 (11, 34.4%), sul2 (9, 28.1%), catA and cmlA (11, 34.4%), qepA and aac(6′)-Ib-cr (9, 28.1%) and strAB and aadA1 (2, 6.3%) in E. coli, and qnrB (13, 86.7%), qnrS (3, 20%), oqxB (13, 86.7%), tetA (13, 86.7%), and sul2 (13, 86.7%) in K. pneumoniae isolates. Phylogenetic groups identified among E. coli isolates included B1 (4, 12.5%), B2 (6, 18.8%), C (10, 31.3%), D (3, 9.4%), and E (9, 28.1%). PCR-based replicon typing (PBRT) showed the predominance of IncFIA and IncFIB plasmids in E. coli; however, in K. pneumoniae, the major replicon type detected was IncHI1. Invariably, all isolates of K. pneumoniae harbored virulence-associated genes viz., iutA, entB, and mrkD. Epidemiological typing by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) revealed that E. coli isolates recovered from different farms were genetically unrelated, whereas isolates of K. pneumoniae showed considerable genetic relatedness. In conclusion, our findings provide evidence that shrimp aquaculture environments can act as reservoirs of multi-drug resistant E. coli and K. pneumoniae.

Plant molecular farming (PMF) is a convenient and cost-effective way to produce high-value recombinant proteins that can be used in the production of a range of health products, from pharmaceutical therapeutics to cosmetic products. New plant breeding techniques (NPBTs) provide a means to enhance PMF systems more quickly and with greater precision than ever before. However, the feasibility, regulatory standing and social acceptability of both PMF and NPBTs are in question. This paper explores the perceptions of key stakeholders on two European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 programmes-Pharma-Factory and Newcotianatowards the barriers and facilitators of PMF and NPBTs in Europe. One-on-one qualitative interviews were undertaken with N = 20 individuals involved in one or both of the two projects at 16 institutions in seven countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Israel, Spain and the UK). The findings indicate that the current EU regulatory environment and the perception of the public towards biotechnology are seen as the main barriers to scaling-up PMF and NPBTs. Competition from existing systems and the lack of plant-specific regulations likewise present challenges for PMF developing beyond its current niche. However, respondents felt that the communication of the benefits and purpose of NPBT PMF could provide a platform for improving the social acceptance of genetic modification. The importance of the media in this process was highlighted. This article also uses the multi-level perspective to explore the ways in which NPBTs are being legitimated by interested parties and the systemic factors that have shaped and are continuing to shape the development of PMF in Europe. PLOS ONEPLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.The use of plants as platforms for the expression of recombinant proteins was first demonstrated in the late 1980s and early 1990s -primarily with the tobacco plant [23][24][25]. It would take over a decade for the first commercial product to be launched [8], but since that time a PLOS ONEBarriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.Barriers and facilitators to scaling-up plant molecular farming PLOS ONE | https://doi.org/10.

Campylobacter is the leading cause of human bacterial diarrhoeal disease worldwide, with poultry meat products contributing to a large proportion of cases. Due to the ubiquitous presence of Campylobacter in the poultry farm environment, biosecurity is the main area for intervention to prevent colonisation of commercial broiler chicken flocks. However, research has repeatedly demonstrated that farmers' uptake of biosecurity recommendations is often poor. This study explored farmers' attitudes towards biosecurity and identified barriers to effective implementation of biosecurity protocols. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 1–3 members of staff on each of 16 broiler farms; 6 owned by, and 10 contracted to, 3 different UK poultry integrators. In total, 28 interviewees participated, including farm owners, managers, and workers, with a range of industry experience. Thematic analysis of the interviews revealed high levels of recognition amongst broiler farmers of the importance of Campylobacter and the responsibility of the whole farm-to-fork chain within the poultry industry to reduce Campylobacter contamination of chicken meat for the benefit of public health. Participants' self-reported awareness and implementation of biosecurity has improved significantly following the industry-wide focus on Campylobacter control. However, there are frustrations with the industry's approach to tackling Campylobacter and the heavy burden of responsibility that has been put on interventions at the farm-level. There was also scepticism amongst participants as to the effectiveness of current biosecurity measures in the reduction of Campylobacter. Nevertheless, the interviewees' recognition of the benefit of improved biosecurity on broiler health and welfare and other important targets, such as reducing antimicrobial usage, leaves a legacy of which the UK broiler industry can be proud. There is scope for further farmer education about the evidence supporting biosecurity interventions, particularly in the control of Campylobacter, and a need to establish more effective channels of communication. Furthermore, to give all players within the industry agency and investment in industry targets, contributions from all levels should be permitted in the design of future biosecurity interventions. Biosecurity compliance may be improved through collaborative efforts, such as participatory and co-design practises, to facilitate knowledge co-creation and exchange.