reviewed independently by 4 neuropathologists to determine interobserver diagnostic concordance rates. Cases wherein diagnostic disagreements arose were re-1 Division of Neuropathology, Barrow Neurologviewed jointly to identify and refine the histologic criteria that were adversely ical Institute, St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical affecting diagnostic reproducibility. Using the criteria developed in the study, a Center, Phoenix, Arizona.set of 315 gliomas with known survival data was evaluated in order to validate the 2 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medusefulness of the criteria. icine, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation, Roch-
RESULTS.There was significant improvement in diagnostic concordance with each ester, Minnesota.session (P Å 0.02). For the first session, the concordance rates were as follows: all 3 Department of Neuropathology, The Ohio 4 reviewers, 52%; any 3 reviewers, 60%; 2 reviewers, 70%. For the fourth session, State University, Columbus, Ohio.the respective rates were 69%, 75%, and 80%. Although features important in grading, particularly microvascular proliferation, were sometimes problematic, 4 Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.most disagreements related to the classification of tumors. Much of the improvement related to the refinement of criteria distinguishing diffuse astrocytomas from oligodendrogliomas/oligoastrocytomas and pilocytic astrocytomas. It was concluded that the presence of any typical oligodendroglioma was sufficient to remove a tumor from the astrocytoma category.
CONCLUSIONS.The authors' data indicate that oligodendroglial tumors comprise up to 25% of gliomas, a significantly higher proportion than was previously recognized. The data also suggest that the wide range of survival times reported for patients with anaplastic astrocytoma may reflect ''contamination'' resulting from misdiagnosis, particularly of oligodendroglial tumors and pilocytic astrocytomas.