No abstract

People living with mental health problems often face stigma and discrimination; however, there is a lack of research that examines how comorbid conditions affect this perceived stigma. This study sought to determine whether people who have a comorbid physical and psychiatric disability experience more stigma than those with only a psychiatric disability. It also looked at how perceived stigma and discrimination affect physical and mental health. A secondary analysis on data from interviews with 336 former and current clients of the mental health system in a mid-size Canadian city in 2005 was performed. Of these, 203 (60.4%) reported they had a psychiatric disability, 112 (33.0%) reported that they had a physical disability, with 74 reporting both a psychiatric and a physical disability. People with a self-reported psychiatric disability and a self-reported comorbid physical disability faced more overall perceived discrimination/stigma (P = 0.04), than those with a psychiatric disability alone. Perceived discrimination/stigma was positively correlated with psychiatric problem severity (P = 0.02), and negatively correlated with self-rated general health (P < 0.001), physical condition (P < 0.001), emotional well-being (P < 0.001) and life satisfaction (P < 0.001). These results bring to light the aggravating effect of a physical disability on the perceived stigma for those living with a mental illness, and also strengthen the knowledge that stigma and discrimination have a negative impact on health. Healthcare providers should recognise this negative impact and screen for these comorbid conditions. Policy-makers should take measures such as improving access to housing and employment services to help reduce stigma and discrimination against this particularly vulnerable group.

Objectives: Although leading organizations have developed gastroenteritis management guidelines, little is known about emergency department (ED) use of clinical tools to improve outcomes. Our objective was to describe pediatric gastroenteritis clinical decision tools employed in EDs in the province of Ontario and to determine if a greater number of clinical decision tools are employed in academic, high-volume institutions staffed primarily by emergency medicine (EM)-trained physicians.Methods: A cross-sectional, Internet-based survey was distributed in the summer of 2010 to medical directors and managers of Ontario EDs. Domains included patient population, general resources, and gastroenteritis-specific strategies. Copies were requested of all gastroenteritis-specific strategies to enable a content review.Results: A total of 133 (83%) of 160 eligible participants responded. Practice guidelines, pathways, or order sets; medical directives; and printed discharge instructions were reported to be in use at 38 of the 133 (29%), 69 of 133 (52%), and 105 of 133 (79%) of the responding institutions, respectively. Oral rehydration therapy (ORT) is routinely initiated at triage in only 51 of the 133 of the EDs (38%). Highvolume institutions are more likely to have clinical practice guidelines, pathways, or order sets (p = 0.001) than low-and medium-volume EDs. Physician training in EM was associated with the presence of medical directives for nursing administration of antiemetics and antipyretics (p = 0.04). Review of clinical practice guidelines, pathways, and order sets showed that only six of 27 gastroenteritis-specific strategies reviewed were correctly classified, and 20 (74%) met prespecified quality criteria.