Objective To evaluate seroreactivity and disease flares after COVID‐19 vaccination in a multi‐ethnic/racial cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Methods 90 SLE patients and 20 healthy controls receiving a complete COVID‐19 vaccine regimen were included. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS‐CoV‐2 spike receptor‐binding domain (RBD) and SARS‐CoV‐2 microneutralization were used to evaluate B cell responses; IFN‐γ production to assess T cell responses was measured by ELISpot. Disease activity was measured by the hybrid SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI) and flares were assigned by the SELENA/SLEDAI flare index. Results Overall, fully vaccinated SLE patients produced significantly lower IgG antibodies against SARS‐CoV‐2 spike RBD than controls. Twenty‐six SLE patients (28.8%) generated an IgG response below that of the lowest control (<100 units/ml). In logistic regression analyses, the use of any immunosuppressant or prednisone and a normal anti‐dsDNA level prior to vaccination associated with decreased vaccine responses. IgG seroreactivity to the SARS‐CoV‐2 Spike RBD strongly correlated with the SARS‐CoV‐2 microneutralization titers and antigen‐specific IFN‐γ production determined by ELISpot. In a subset of patients with poor antibody responses, IFN‐γ production was likewise diminished. Pre‐/post‐vaccination SLEDAI scores were similar. Only 11.4% of patients had a post‐vaccination flare; 1.3% were severe. Conclusion In a multi‐ethnic/racial study of SLE patients 29% had a low response to the COVID‐19 vaccine which was associated with being on immunosuppression. Reassuringly, disease flares were rare. While minimal protective levels remain unknown, these data suggest protocol development is needed to assess efficacy of booster vaccination.

No abstract

Objective To characterize patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) affected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) and to analyze associations of comorbidities and medications on infection outcomes. Methods Patients with SLE and reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID‐19 were identified through an established New York University lupus cohort, query of 2 hospital systems, and referrals from rheumatologists. Data were prospectively collected via a web‐based questionnaire and review of medical records. Data on baseline characteristics were obtained for all patients with COVID‐19 to analyze risk factors for hospitalization. Data were also collected on asymptomatic patients and those with COVID‐19–like symptoms who tested negative or were not tested. Statistical analyses were limited to confirmed COVID‐19–positive patients. Results A total of 226 SLE patients were included: 41 with confirmed COVID‐19, 19 who tested negative for COVID‐19, 42 with COVID‐19–like symptoms who did not get tested, and 124 who remained asymptomatic without testing. Of the SLE patients with confirmed COVID‐19, hospitalization was required in 24 (59%) and intensive care unit–level of care in 4, and 4 died. Hospitalized patients tended to be older, nonwhite, Hispanic, have higher body mas index (BMI), history of nephritis, and at least 1 comorbidity. An exploratory (due to limited sample size) logistic regression analysis identified race, presence of at least 1 comorbidity, and BMI as independent predictors of hospitalization. Conclusion In general, the variables predictive of hospitalization in our SLE patients were similar to those identified in the general population. Further studies are needed to understand additional risk factors for poor COVID‐19 outcomes in patients with SLE.

Gout is a common rheumatic condition, with increasing prevalence in recent decades. The mainstay of treatment for gout is oral urate-lowering therapy (ULT), typically with xanthine oxidase inhibitors (XOIs). Unfortunately, a proportion of patients have persistent gout that is refractory to ULT. Pegloticase, a recombinant pegylated uricase, has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of refractory gout. However, concern has been raised regarding the risk of infusion reactions, which are now understood to be largely due to the development of antipegloticase antibodies. Discontinuation of pegloticase upon failure to lower serum urate has been shown to markedly reduce infusion reaction risk, but deprives patients of what, in many cases, is a last-resort treatment. In this manuscript, we review the rationale, mechanism of action, efficacy and safety of pegloticase. Additionally, we focus on potential strategies to reduce pegloticase immunogenicity and potentially make this important agent available to a wider group of patients requiring treatment.