The acute and permanent effects of noise exposure on the endocochlear potential (EP) and cochlear lateral wall were evaluated in BALB/cJ (BALB) inbred mice, and compared with CBA/J (CBA) and C57BL/6 (B6) mice. Two-hour exposure to broadband noise (4-45 kHz) at 110 dB SPL leads to a~50 mV reduction in the EP in BALB and CBA, but not B6. EP reduction in BALB and CBA is reliably associated with characteristic acute cellular pathology in stria vascularis and spiral ligament. By 8 weeks after exposure, the EP in CBA mice has returned to normal. In BALBs, however, the EP remains depressed by an average~10 mV, so that permanent EP reduction contributes to permanent threshold shifts in these mice. We recently showed that the CBA noise phenotype in part reflects the influence of a large effect quantitative trait locus on Chr. 18, termed Nirep (Ohlemiller et al., Hear Res 260:47-53, 2010b). While CBA "EP susceptibility" alleles are dominant to those in B6, examination of (B6×BALB) F1 hybrid mice and (F1×BALB) N2 backcross mice revealed that noise-related EP reduction and associated cell pathology in BALBs are inherited in an autosomal recessive manner, and are dependent on multiple genes. Moreover, while N2 mice formed from B6 and CBA retain strong correspondence between acute EP reduction, ligament pathology, and strial pathology, N2s formed from B6 and BALB include subsets that dissociate pathology of ligament and stria. We conclude that the genes and cascades that govern the very similar EP susceptibility phenotypes in BALB and CBA mice need not be the same. BALBs appear to carry alleles that promote more pronounced long term effects of noise on the lateral wall. Separate loci in BALBs may preferentially impact stria versus ligament.
We recently demonstrated that sub-chronic low-dose kanamycin (KM, 300 mg/kg sc, 2x/day, 10 days) dramatically reduces permanent noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) and hair cell loss in 1 month old CBA/J mice (Fernandez et al., 2010, J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 11, 235–244). Protection by KM remained for at least 48 hours after the last dose, and appeared to involve a cumulative effect of multiple doses as part of a preconditioning process. The first month of life lies within the early ‘sensitive period’ for both cochlear noise and ototoxic injury in mice, and CBA/J mice appear exquisitely vulnerable to noise during this period (Ohlemiller et al., 2011, Hearing Res. 272, 13–20). From our initial data, we could not rule out 1) that less rigorous treatment protocols than the intensive one we applied may be equally—or more—protective; 2) that protection by KM is tightly linked to processes unique to the sensitive period for noise or ototoxins; or 3) that protection by KM is exclusive to CBA/J mice. The present experiments address these questions by varying the number and timing of fixed doses (300 mg/kg sc) of KM, as well as the age at treatment in CBA/J mice. We also tested for protection in young C57BL/6J (B6) mice. We find that nearly complete protection against at least 2 hours of intense (110 dB SPL) broadband noise can be observed in CBA/J mice at least for ages up to 1 year. Reducing dosing frequency to as little as once every other day (a four-fold decrease in dosing frequency) appeared as protective as twice per day. However, reducing the number of doses to just 1 or 2, followed by noise 24 or 48 hrs later greatly reduced protection. Notably, hearing thresholds and hair cells in young B6 mice appeared completely unprotected by the same regimen that dramatically protects CBA/J mice. We conclude that protective effects of KM against NIHL in CBA/J mice can be engaged by a wide range of dosing regimens, and are not exclusive to the sensitive period for noise or ototoxins. While we cannot presently judge the generality of protection across genetic backgrounds, it appears not to be universal, since B6 showed no benefit. Classical genetic approaches based on CBA/J × B6 crosses may reveal loci critical to protective cascades engaged by kanamycin and perhaps other preconditioners. Their human analogs may partly determine who is at elevated risk of acquired hearing loss.
We recently demonstrated a striking difference among inbred mouse strains in the effects of a single noise exposure, whereby CBA/J and CBA/CaJ (CBA) mice show moderate reversible reduction in the endocochlear potential (EP) while C57BL/6J (B6) mice do not (Ohlemiller, K.K., Gagnon, P.M. 2007. Genetic dependence of cochlear cells and structures injured by noise. Hearing Res. 224,[34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50]. Acute EP reduction in CBA was reliably associated with characteristic pathology of the spiral ligament and stria vascularis, both immediately after noise and 8 weeks later. Analysis of B6×CBA F1 hybrid mice indicated that EP reduction and its anatomic correlates are co-inherited in an autosomal dominant manner. Further analysis of N2 mice resulting from the backcross of F1 hybrids to B6 mice led us to suggest that the EP reduction phenotype principally reflects the influence of a small number of quantitative trait loci (QTLs). Here we report the results of QTL mapping of the EP reduction phenotype in CBA/J using 106 N2 mice from a (CBA×B6) × B6 backcross. Correlation of acute post-noise EP with 135 markers distributed throughout the genome revealed a single major effect QTL on chromosome 18 (12.5 cM, LOD 3.57) (Nirep, for Noise-induced reduction in EP QTL), and two marginally significant QTLs on chromosomes 5 and 16 (LOD 1.43 and 1.73, respectively). Our results underscore that fact that different cochlear structures may possess different susceptibilities to noise through the influence of non-overlapping genes. While Nirep and similaracting QTLs do not appear to influence the extent of permanent hearing loss from a single noise exposure, they could reduce the homeostatic 'reserve' of the lateral wall in protracted or continual exposures, and thereby influence long term threshold stability.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.