[Purpose] To investigate the effect of electrical stimulation and pelvic floor muscle
training on muscle strength, urinary incontinence and erectile function in men with
prostate cancer treated by radical prostatectomy. [Subjects and Methods] One hundred
twenty-three males were randomized into 3 groups 1 month after RP: (G1, n=40) control;
(G2, n=41) guideline: patients were instructed to perform three types of home exercises to
strengthen the pelvic floor and (G3, n=42) electrical stimulation: patients in this group
were also instructed to perform exercises as group G2, and also received anal
electro-stimulation therapy, twice a week for 7 weeks. The primary outcome assessment was
based on the measurement of the recovery of pelvic floor muscle strength between groups.
Secondary outcomes were: 1 hour Pad Test, ICIQ-SF, IIEF-5 and IPSS. Data were obtained
preoperatively and at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery. [Results] There was no significant
difference in the demographic data among groups. Greater urinary leakage and pelvic floor
muscle weakness in the first month compared to pre treatment improved after 3 and 6 months
postoperative, without difference among groups. [Conclusion] The muscle strength recovery
occurs independently of the therapy employed. Pelvic floor exercises or electrical
stimulation also did not have an impact on the recovery of urinary continence and erectile
function in our study.
[Purpose] The aim of this double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled study is to
investigate the effects of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation for reducing the
side effects of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in cancer patients undergoing
chemotherapy with oxaloplatin or paclitaxel. [Subjects and Methods] Twenty-four patients
were randomly allocated into two groups: active or placebo stimulation. All patients were
assessed for pain, numbness/tingiling, frequency of symptoms, and quality of life. The
transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation device was applied daily with modulating
frequencies ranging between 7 Hz and 65 Hz in distal limb regions during three cycles of
chemotherapy (45 days). The other stimulation parameters were: pulse duration of 200 μsec,
intensity at the highest tolerable level, and increases in intensity when it diminished.
[Results] The data showed no difference between active or placebo groups in terms of pain,
numbness/tingling, frequency of symptoms or impact on daily life activities. [Conclusion]
These results suggest that Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation applied in the
frequency variation mode was not proven to be effective to improve the symptoms of
Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy during chemotherapy cycles. There was no
worsening of symptoms in subsequent cycles of the onset of symptoms of the disease.
Background: The etiology of lymphedema is multifactorial, and definition criteria of lymphedema, its limitation, and follow-up must be considered in studies related to risk factors. The aim of this study is to evaluate risk factors related to arm lymphedema in a cohort study with a long follow-up. Patients and Methods: The study was performed in 622 breast cancer patients. The main endpoint reported was the presence of clinical lymphedema reported in medical records. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to identify factors related to lymphedema. Results: 66.4% of the patients were submitted to mastectomy, 88.4% to level III axillary lymphadenectomy, 34.9% to radiotherapy in the supraclavicular fossa, and 4.3% to axillary radiotherapy. The mean follow-up was 96.7 months. 45 patients (7.2%) developed lymphedema, of which 82.2% had developed lymphedema at 60 months. Univariate regression analysis showed that supraclavicular radiotherapy, adjuvant/palliative chemotherapy, ≥ 15 lymph nodes dissected, and axillary surgery increase the lymphedema rate by 1.87, 2.28, 2.03, and 6.17, respectively. Adjusted multivariate regression analysis showed that the combination of axillary dissection and number of lymph nodes dissected was the main factor related to lymphedema (p = 0.017). Conclusion: In the pre-sentinel era, axillary dissection and the number of lymph nodes resected are related to 10-year lymphedema.
Abstract. The aim of this study was to confirm the effectiveness of early physiotherapeutic stimulation for lymphatic flow progression in patients with breast cancer undergoing axillary dissection. This was a randomized experimental study on 22 patients who underwent lymphoscintigraphy in their arms on two different occasions, firstly without stimulation and secondly after randomization into two groups: without physiotherapeutic stimulation (WOPS; n=10) and with physiotherapeutic stimulation (WPS; n=12). The lymphoscintigraphy scan was performed with 99m Tc-phytate administered into the second interdigital space of the hand, ipsilaterally to the dissected axilla, in three phases: dynamic, static, and delayed whole body imaging. Physiotherapeutic stimulation was carried out using Földi's technique. In both groups, images from the two examinations of each patient were compared. Flow progression was considered positive when, on the second examination, the radiopharmaceutical reached areas more distant from the injection site. Statistical analysis was used to evaluate frequencies, percentages and central trend measurements, and non-parametric tests were conducted. Descriptive analysis showed that the WPS and WOPS groups were similar in terms of mean age, weight, height, body mass index and number of lymph nodes removed. There were statistically significant associations between physiotherapeutic stimulation and radiopharmaceutical progression at all three phases of the study (p<0.0001). Early physiotherapeutic stimulation in breast cancer patients undergoing radical axillary dissection is effective, and can therefore be indicated as a preventive measure against lymphedema.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.