Purpose of review Childhood obesity is escalating globally. Lifestyle and behavioral changes, which are the frequently used interventions in clinical practice, lead to only modest improvements in children with established obesity. Bariatric surgery is currently the most effective obesity treatment but has very limited utilization in pediatric obesity and is preferentially used for children with worsening comorbidities. There exists a massive treatment gap for children suffering with obesity especially after the failure of lifestyle modifications. Pharmacotherapy that is an established management tool in adults is very infrequently used in children. Only two medications, Phentermine and Orlistat are approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for use in adolescent obesity. Herein, we discuss the current landscape and available literature on the use of antiobesity pharmacotherapy in children. Recent findings There are emerging pediatric data about the efficacy of the many weight loss medications that are FDA approved in adults. Moreover, more clinical trials are underway on the rarer, intractable forms of obesity such as monogenic, syndromic, and hypothalamic obesity. Summary Weight loss medications in children, like adults, have variable efficacy and similar side effect profiles. Rigorous research and improved education of providers about weight loss medications may address the huge treatment gap in severe pediatric obesity.

Background Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a restrictive eating disorder commonly associated with medical complications of undernutrition and low weight. In adolescence, a critical time for bone accrual, the impact of ARFID on bone health is uncertain. We aimed to study bone health in low-weight females with ARFID, as well as the association between peptide YY (PYY), an anorexigenic hormone with a role in regulation of bone metabolism, and bone mineral density (BMD) in these individuals. We hypothesized that BMD would be lower in low-weight females with ARFID than healthy controls (HC), and that PYY levels would be negatively associated with BMD. Methods We performed a cross-sectional study in 14 adolescent low-weight females with ARFID and 20 HC 10–23 years old. We assessed BMD (total body, total body less head and lumbar spine) using dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and assessed fasting total PYY concentration in blood. Results Total body BMD Z-scores were significantly lower in ARFID than in HC (− 1.41 ± 0.28 vs. − 0.50 ± 0.25, p = 0.021). Mean PYY levels trended higher in ARFID vs. HC (98.18 ± 13.55 pg/ml vs. 71.40 ± 5.61 pg/ml, p = 0.055). In multivariate analysis within the ARFID group, PYY was negatively associated with lumbar BMD adjusted for age (β = -0.481, p = 0.032). Conclusion Our findings suggest that female adolescents with low-weight ARFID may have lower BMD than healthy controls and that higher PYY levels may be associated with lower BMD at some, but not all, sites in ARFID. Further research with larger samples will be important to investigate whether high PYY drives bone loss in ARFID.

No abstract