In clinical practice, patients with anorexia nervosa (AN), their carers and clinicians often disagree about psychopharmacological treatment. We developed two corresponding questionnaires to survey the perspectives of patients with AN and their carers on psychopharmacological treatment. These questionnaires were distributed to 36 patients and 37 carers as a quality improvement project on a specialist unit for eating disorders at the South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust. Although most patients did not believe that medication could help with AN, the majority thought that medication for AN should help with anxiety (61.1%), concentration (52.8%), sleep problems (52.8%) and anorexic thoughts (55.6%). Most of the carers shared the view that drug treatment for AN should help with anxiety (54%) and anorexic thoughts (64.8%). Most patients had concerns about potential weight gain, increased appetite, changes in body shape and metabolism during psychopharmacological treatment. By contrast, the majority of carers were not concerned about these specific side effects. Some of the concerns expressed by the patients seem to be AN-related. However, their desire for help with anxiety and anorexic thoughts, which is shared by their carers, should be taken seriously by clinicians when choosing a medication or planning psychopharmacological studies.

AimsThe Specialist Adolescent Mental Health Service at the Maudsley Hospital provides multi-disciplinary mental health care to adolescents in London. There is currently no policy by which non-medical members of the multi-disciplinary team can request a psychiatric review for their patients. Staff feedback revealed problems with the medical review referral process to be a lack of clarity on how to make referrals, and a lack of transparency (e.g. referral outcome, approximate waiting time).This projected aimed to improve the clarity of the process for requesting psychiatric reviews and to develop skills in leadership as a future child psychiatrist.MethodsWe designed and introduced a referral form and integrated waiting list. Next we developed a policy document for making referrals. Finally we modified the referral form so that when submitted, it automatically updated the integrated waiting list. At the outset and after each intervention we resurveyed the staff.ResultsAt the outset 71% of staff reported finding the process somewhat unclear, while 29% reported finding the referral process neither clear nor unclear. Following the final change 100% staff each reported finding the process very clear or somewhat clear.ConclusionThe changes we implemented resulted in a clearer and more transparent referral process for medical reviews. We anticipate that this improved staff satisfaction will equally translate into some benefits for patient care, such as more clarity around when a medical review can be expected and what it might entail.

IntroductionDespite plasma levels of certain HIV drugs decreasing in the third trimester of pregnancy there is no definitive evidence that therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) improves HIV control and prevents mother-to-child transmission (MTCT). Indeed “one-off” TDM measurements are thought to poorly correlate with overall drug exposure [1]. We aim to describe baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of pregnant women with HIV, and to compare their HIV control, management during pregnancy and neonatal outcomes with respect to whether TDM was performed.Materials and MethodsRetrospective cross-sectional case note analysis was performed on pregnant women with HIV who attended North Manchester General Hospital and Manchester Royal Infirmary from 1st January 2008 to 28th May 2013.ResultsA total of 171 pregnancies were included; 39% (n=66) had TDM. The majority of patients were of African origin (85%) and age range was 16–42 years (median 32 years). TDM was found to be associated with a history of poor adherence to therapy (TDM 23%, vs no TDM 10%, p=0.017), although baseline viral load (VL) and CD4 counts were comparable between TDM and non-TDM groups (p=0.4756 and 0.9492, respectively). TDM was also associated with protease inhibitors (PI) (TDM 94% vs no TDM 77%, p= 0.004). Within the PI group, TDM was more strongly associated with atazanavir use than other PI's (55%, p=0.023). TDM was not associated with any other demographic variable or with either of the two hospital sites (p=0.427). TDM was associated with medication alterations during pregnancy (TDM 67% vs no TDM 13%, p=0.052), but was not associated with any difference in outcomes with similar proportions of newly detectable VL during pregnancy (TDM 12% vs no TDM 7%, p=0.220) and VL detectable at birth (TDM 14% vs no TDM 9%, p= 0.293). There were no instances of MTCT.ConclusionsTDM was associated with PI use and a history of poor adherence at baseline. TDM was not associated with improved HIV control during pregnancy and there was no MTCT. TDM was not shown to have any additional benefit in pregnancy and its routine use is not recommended to improve HIV control or reduce MTCT.

There is no proven benefit for the routine use of therapeutic drug monitoring in HIV-positive pregnant women either for improving viral control or preventing mother-to-child transmission. This analysis reviewed a cohort of 171 HIV-positive pregnant women delivering between 1 January 2008 and 28 May 2013 to first establish which baseline characteristics are associated with having therapeutic drug monitoring performed, and whether therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with improved HIV control during pregnancy or mother-to-child transmission. Therapeutic drug monitoring was performed in 39% ( n = 66) of patients; it was associated with baseline characteristics of poor adherence to therapy (therapeutic drug monitoring 23% versus non-therapeutic drug monitoring 10%, p = 0.025) and the use of protease inhibitors (therapeutic drug monitoring 94% versus non-therapeutic drug monitoring 77%, p = 0.005). By multivariate analysis therapeutic drug monitoring was associated with medication alterations during pregnancy (therapeutic drug monitoring 68% versus non-therapeutic drug monitoring 12%, p = < 0.001), but not associated with any difference in viral load breakthrough during pregnancy (therapeutic drug monitoring 12% versus non-therapeutic drug monitoring 7%, p = 0.456) and viral load detectable at birth (therapeutic drug monitoring 14% versus non-therapeutic drug monitoring 9%, p = 0.503). There were no instances of mother-to-child transmission. Therapeutic drug monitoring's association with medication changes is postulated as partially causal in this cohort. There was no evidence of any association with improved control or reduced transmission of HIV to advocate routine therapeutic drug monitoring use.