Background: An increasing number of traumatic injuries in low- and low-middle-income countries (LICs/LMICs) have coexisting injuries requiring soft-tissue coverage (flaps). Yet, there is a lack of subspecialty care and flap training in Latin America. This study assesses the effectiveness of a surgical skills training course in improving rotational and free flap knowledge and identifies barriers to performing these types of flaps. Methods: Participants attending a surgical skills training course in Guadalajara, Mexico completed a pre/postcourse flaps knowledge survey consisting of 15 questions from the plastic surgery in-training examination and also completed a 7-point Likert survey regarding perceived barriers to performing flaps at their institution. Results: Of the course participants, 17 (44.7%) completed the precourse knowledge survey, 24 (63.2%) completed the postcourse survey, and 37 (97.4%) completed the barriers survey. Scores improved from pre- to postcourse knowledge surveys (39.6% to 53.6%, P = .005). Plastic surgery subsection scores also improved (39.0% to 60.4%, P = .003). Twenty-five percent of attendees received prior flap training and had plastic surgeons available to perform flaps. Few participants (38.9%) reported flap procedures being commonly completed at their hospitals. Participants stating that flaps were uncommon in their hospital reported more institutional barriers and less access to dermatomes. These participants also reported lack of operating room and surgical personnel availability. Conclusion: A surgical skills training course may be useful in improving knowledge of soft-tissue coverage procedures. There are also modifiable physician and institutional barriers that can improve the ability to perform rotational and free flaps as identified by the course participants.

Background: In orthopaedic surgery departments, foot and ankle fellowship directors are tasked to create a robust clinical curriculum for trainees, while division chiefs manage the division’s delivery of patient care. The primary aim of this study was to describe characteristics of foot and ankle surgery fellowship directors and division chiefs in an effort to recognize trends or disparities in leadership traits. Methods: The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) fellowship directory for 2021 to 2022 was reviewed for AOFAS-recognized fellowship programs in the United States. Between March 2021 and June 2021, 48 fellowship directors and 23 publicly recognized division chiefs were administered an electronic survey to collect demographic, educational, and professional data. Univariate and bivariate statistical analyses were performed. Results: A total of 42 of the 48 (87.5%) fellowship directors and 18 of the 23 (78.3%) division chiefs responded to the questionnaire. Of the 48 fellowship directors, 45 (93.8%) were male, 43 (89.6%) identified as Caucasian, their average age at leadership appointment was 42.6 ± 7.5 (range, 32-70) years, and the average time between fellowship graduation and leadership appointment was 9.9 ± 7.8 (range, 0-36) years. Of the 23 chiefs, 22 (95.7%) were male, 20 (87.0%) identified as Caucasians, their average age at leadership appointment was 41.7 ± 7.8 (range, 32-53) years, and the average time between fellowship graduation and leadership appointment was 9.8 ± 6.8 (range, 2-21) years. The average H-index for the chiefs was greater than that of the fellowship directors (18.4 vs 13.4, P = .0373) when controlling for years of training>. Conclusion: The majority of current leaders identify as middle-age Caucasian males, demonstrate high research productivity, and have attended a select number of the same residency and fellowship training programs. By demonstrating the lack of diversity within foot and ankle surgery leadership, this study serves as a call to action for making inclusivity a priority. Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Cross-sectional study

No abstract

BACKGROUND The national rates of readmission and reoperation after open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents is unknown. AIM To determine rates of and risk factors for readmission and reoperation after ORIF of midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. METHODS This retrospective study utilized data from the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for California and Florida and included 11728 patients 10–18 years of age that underwent ORIF of midshaft clavicle fracture between 2005 and 2012. Readmissions within ninety days, reoperations within two years, and differences in patient demographic factors were determined through descriptive, univariate, and multivariate analyses. RESULTS In total, 3.29% ( n = 11) of patients were readmitted within 90 d to a hospital at an average of 18.91 ± 18 d after discharge, while 15.87% ( n = 53) of patients underwent a reoperation within two years at an average of 209.53 ± 151 d since the index surgery. The most common reason for readmission was a postoperative infection ( n < 10). Reasons for reoperation included implant removal ( n = 49) at an average time of 202.39 ± 138 d after surgery, and revision ORIF ( n < 10) with an average time of 297 ± 289 d after index surgery. The odds of reoperation were higher for females ( P < 0.01) and outpatients ( P < 0.01), while the odds of reoperation were lower for patients who underwent surgery in California ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSION There is a low rate of readmission and a high rate of reoperation after ORIF for midshaft clavicle fractures in adolescents. There are significant differences for reoperation based on patient sex, location, and hospital type.