The reported association between passive smoking and respiratory illness in children has been based on the parents' assessment of their own level of smoking. To more critically evaluate a causal relationship between passive smoking and childhood ill health, we used urinary cotinine, which is the major metabolite of nicotine and has a long half-life, to objectively quantitate the level of passive smoking in children. Urine was collected from 609 children (median age 3.8 yr, range 1 month to 17 yr) on admission to hospital; cotinine levels were obtained in 491 of these samples, and a comprehensive respiratory questionnaire was completed for 468 children. Statistical analysis was carried out on transformed data using both parametric and nonparametric statistics. Cotinine levels in the children correlated with the parents' current smoking (p less than 0.001). Elevated levels were found in the 41 children admitted with bronchiolitis compared with a group of a similarly aged children with nonrespiratory illnesses (p less than 0.02). Elevated levels were not found for any other diagnosis. We conclude that the urinary cotinine approach has provided objective evidence linking passive smoking to hospital admission for bronchiolitis in infants.

No abstract

Objective: This study sought to explain results of the Water Up!@Home randomized controlled trial where low-income parents were randomized to receive an educational intervention +a low-cost water filter pitcher or only the filter. Parents in both groups had reported statistically significant reductions in SSB and increases in water intake post-intervention. Design: Qualitative explanatory in-depth interviews analyzed thematically and deductively. Setting: Washington DC metropolitan area, US. Participants: Low-income Latino parents of infants/toddlers who had participated in the Water UP! @Home randomized controlled trial. Results: The filter stimulated water consumption in both groups by: 1) increasing parents’ perception of water safety, 2) acting as a cue to action to drink water, 3) improving the flavor of water (which was linked to perceptions of safety), and 4) increasing the perception that this option was more economical than purchasing bottled water. Safe and palatable drinking water was more accessible and freely available in their homes; participants felt they did not need to ration their water consumption as before. Only intervention participants were able to describe a reduction in SSB intake and described strategies, skills, and knowledge gained to reduce SSB intake. Among the comparison group, there was no thematic consensus about changes in SSB or any strategies or skills to reduce SSB intake. Conclusions: A low-cost water filter facilitated water consumption, which actively (or passively for comparison group) displaced SSB consumption. The findings have implications for understanding and addressing the role of water security on SSB consumption.