The reader will be able to: (i) define the difference between immediate and delayed sentence recall and different types of distractors, (ii) explain the utility of immediate and delayed recall sentence recall in language assessment, (iii) discuss suitability of delayed recall for the assessment of semantics.

After adoption of the 2008 Consensus Model for Advanced Practice Registered Nurse (APRN) Regulation, evolution of the nurse practitioner (NP) role and emergency NP (ENP) specialty has outpaced regulatory standards. Lack of uniformity among regulators, health insurance providers, and employers in acknowledging the ENP specialty has created barriers to practice and access to care. This article serves to identify potential outcomes if the ENP specialty was transitioned to a population within the Consensus Model of Regulation. A strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) analysis methodology was used to assess ENP specialty current state, specifically focusing on the licensure, accreditation, certification, and education model for APRN regulation. The data were collected from peerreviewed literature, clinical subject-matter experts, and academic and advanced practice executive leaders. Variances in ENP licensure, recognition, and acknowledgment among State Boards of Nursing leave the ENP specialty in a precarious position. For each of the strengths and opportunities that could exist in recognizing the ENP at the population level of the Consensus Model, there are abundant weaknesses and threats. Although full acknowledgment of the ENP specialty is lacking, regulatory implications are highly variable, and employers' understanding of the APRN educational model is limited, our findings reveal that the ENP specialty is an evolving role that deserves regulatory legitimization. Although ideal placement for the ENP within the Consensus Model remains to be determined, challenges and opportunities exist with both specialty and population options.

No abstract