BackgroundTo explore long-term effects of agalsidase alfa on Fabry disease cardiomyopathy in adults.MethodsRetrospective analysis of prospectively collected data at a single center in Mainz, Germany, revealed that 45 adult patients (21 men, 24 women) had received agalsidase alfa for approximately 10 years. Data were extracted for cardiac and heart failure status, echocardiographic evaluations of cardiac structure and function, and renal function at treatment start and during agalsidase alfa treatment.ResultsAfter 10 years of agalsidase alfa treatment, heart failure classification had improved by at least 1 class in 22/42 patients, and angina scores were stable or improved in 41/42 patients. During treatment, no patients without left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) at treatment initiation developed LVH, and no patients with LVH at treatment initiation showed a decline in left ventricular mass.ConclusionsApproximately 10 years of agalsidase alfa treatment appeared to have beneficial effects for controlling progression and improving some symptoms of Fabry-associated cardiomyopathy.

We found that the delay in diagnosis has not improved substantially whereas the delay in treatment onset has improved in recent years.

BackgroundHereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1‐inhibitor deficiency (C1‐INH‐HAE) is a rare, potentially fatal, bradykinin‐mediated disease. Icatibant is a bradykinin B2 receptor antagonist originally approved in 2008 in the European Union and 2011 in the United States as an acute therapy option for HAE attacks in adults.ObjectiveTo compare demographics, disease characteristics and treatment outcomes of icatibant‐treated HAE attacks in patients with C1‐INH‐HAE enrolled in the Icatibant Outcome Survey across six European countries: Austria, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the UK.MethodsThe Icatibant Outcome Survey [IOS; Shire, Zug, Switzerland (NCT01034969)] is an international observational study monitoring the safety and effectiveness of icatibant. Descriptive, retrospective analyses compared IOS country data derived during July 2009–April 2015.ResultsOverall, 481 patients with C1‐INH‐HAE provided demographic data. A significant difference across countries in age at onset (P = 0.003) and baseline attack frequency (P < 0.001) was found although no significant differences were found with respect to gender (majority female; P = 0.109), age at diagnosis (P = 0.182) or delay in diagnosis (P = 0.059). Icatibant was used to treat 1893 attacks in 325 patients with majority self‐administration in all countries. Overall, significant differences (all P < 0.001) were found across countries in time to treatment [median 1.8 h; median range: 0.0 (Germany–Austria) to 4.4 (France) h], time to resolution [median 6.5 h; median range: 3 (Germany–Austria) to 12 (France) h] and attack duration [median 10.5 h; median range: 3.1 (Germany–Austria) to 18.5 (France) h].ConclusionThese data form the first European cross‐country comparison of disease characteristics and icatibant use in patients with C1‐INH‐HAE who are enrolled in IOS. International variation in icatibant practice and treatment outcomes across the six European countries assessed highlight the need to further investigate the range of country‐specific parameters driving regional variations in icatibant use.

Background The iron-based phosphate binder (PB), sucroferric oxyhydroxide (SFOH), is indicated to control serum phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney disease on dialysis. Methods This non-interventional, prospective, multicentre, cohort study conducted in seven European countries evaluated the safety and effectiveness of SFOH in dialysis patients with hyperphosphataemia in routine practice. Safety outcomes included adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and changes in iron-related parameters. SFOH effectiveness was evaluated by changes-from-baseline (BL) in serum phosphorus and percentage of patients achieving in-target phosphorus levels. Results The safety analysis set included 1365 patients (mean observation: 420.3 ± 239.3 days). Overall, 682 (50.0%) patients discontinued the study. Mean SFOH dose during the observation period was 1172.7 ± 539.9 mg (2.3 pills/day). Overall, 617 (45.2%) patients received concomitant PB(s) during SFOH treatment. ADRs and serious ADRs were observed for 531 (38.9%) and 26 (1.9%) patients. Most frequent ADRs were diarrhoea (194 patients, 14.2%) and discoloured faeces (128 patients, 9.4%). Diarrhoea generally occurred early during SFOH treatment and was mostly mild and transient. Small increases from BL in serum ferritin were observed (ranging from +12 to +75 µg/L). SFOH treatment was associated with serum phosphorus reductions (6.3 ± 1.6 mg/dL at BL versus 5.3 ± 1.8 mg/dL at Month 30; ΔBL: −1.0 mg/dL, P &lt; 0.01). Percentage of patients achieving serum phosphorus ≤4.5 mg/dL increased from 12.0% at BL to 34.8% at Month 30, while the percentage achieving serum phosphorus ≤5.5 mg/dL increased from 29.9% to 63.0%. Conclusions SFOH has a favourable safety and tolerability profile in a real-world setting, consistent with results of the Phase 3 study. Moreover, SFOH improved serum phosphorus control with a low daily pill burden.

BackgroundPatients with hereditary angioedema (HAE) due to C1-inhibitor deficiency (C1-INH-HAE) experience recurrent attacks of cutaneous or submucosal edema that may be frequent and severe; prophylactic treatments can be prescribed to prevent attacks. However, despite the use of long-term prophylaxis (LTP), breakthrough attacks are known to occur. We used data from the Icatibant Outcome Survey (IOS) to evaluate the characteristics of breakthrough attacks and the effectiveness of icatibant as a treatment option.MethodsData on LTP use, attacks, and treatments were recorded. Attack characteristics, treatment characteristics, and outcomes (time to treatment, time to resolution, and duration of attack) were compared for attacks that occurred with versus without LTP.ResultsData on 3228 icatibant-treated attacks from 448 patients with C1-INH-HAE were analyzed; 30.1% of attacks occurred while patients were using LTP. Attack rate, attack severity, and the distribution of attack sites were similar across all types of LTP used, and were comparable to the results found in patients who did not receive LTP. Attacks were successfully treated with icatibant; 82.5% of all breakthrough attacks were treated with a single icatibant injection without C1-INH rescue medication. Treatment outcomes were comparable for breakthrough attacks across all LTP types, and for attacks without LTP.ConclusionsPatients who use LTP should be aware that breakthrough attacks can occur, and such attacks can be severe. Thus, patients with C1-INH-HAE using LTP should have emergency treatment readily available. Data from IOS show that icatibant is effective for the treatment of breakthrough attacks. Trial Registration NCT01034969