Recent public concern has focused on potential reproductive and developmental effects from exposure to low levels of bisphenol A (BPA, CAS number 80-05-7). Two previous published reviews (Gray et al., 2004a; Goodman et al., 2006) conducted weight-of-evidence evaluations of in vivo reproductive/developmental toxicity from BPA exposure < or = 5 mg/kg-d based on studies published through February 2006. Here, an update of those analyses presents additional relevant studies that were published through July 25, 2008, and a weight-of-evidence analysis of the studies evaluated in all three reviews. As with the earlier literature, positive findings: (1) are countered by null findings in more numerous studies; (2) have not been replicated; (3) do not exhibit coherence and plausibility; (4) do not show consistency across species, doses, and time points; and/or (5) were from studies using non-oral exposure routes. Owing to the lack of first-pass metabolism, results from non-oral studies are of limited relevance to human exposure. Exposure levels in most of the low-dose oral and non-oral animal studies are generally much higher than those experienced by even the most exposed people in the general population. The weight of evidence does not support the hypothesis that low oral doses of BPA adversely affect human reproductive and developmental health.
Pain management following pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgery is challenging and traditionally involves perioperative opioids. However, the recent national opioid shortage compelled anesthesiologists at Bellevue Surgery Center to identify an alternative perioperative analgesic regimen that minimizes opioids yet provides effective pain relief. We assembled an interdisciplinary quality improvement team to trial a series of analgesic protocols using the Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle.Initially, we replaced intraoperative morphine and acetaminophen (M/A protocol) with intraoperative dexmedetomidine and preoperative ibuprofen (D/I protocol).However, when results were not favorable, we rapidly transitioned to intraoperative ketorolac and dexmedetomidine (D/K protocol). The following measures were evaluated using statistical process control chart methodology and interpreted using Shewhart's theory of variation: maximum pain score in the postanesthesia care unit, postoperative morphine rescue rate, postanesthesia care unit length of stay, total anesthesia time, postoperative nausea and vomiting rescue rate, and reoperation rate within 30 days of surgery. There were 333 patients in the M/A protocol, 211 patients in the D/I protocol, and 196 patients in the D/K protocol. With the D/I protocol, there were small increases in maximum pain score and postanesthesia care unit length of stay, but no difference in morphine rescue rate or total anesthesia time compared to the M/A protocol. With the D/K protocol, postoperative pain control and postanesthesia care unit length of stay were similar compared to the M/A protocol. Both the D/I and D/K protocols had reduced nausea and vomiting rescue rates. Reoperation rates were similar between groups. In summary, we identified an intraoperative anesthesia protocol for pediatric tonsillectomy and adenotonsillectomy surgery utilizing dexmedetomidine and ketorolac that provides effective analgesia without increasing recovery times or reoperation rates. K E Y W O R D S analgesics, anesthesia, dexmedetomidine, ketorolac, quality improvement, tonsillectomy | 683 FRANZ et Al.
BACKGROUND: Opioids have been a central component of routine adult and pediatric anesthesia for decades. However, the long-term effects of perioperative opioids are concerning. Recent studies show a 4.8%–6.5% incidence of persistent opioid use after surgery in older children and adults. This means that >2 million of the 50 million patients undergoing elective surgeries in the United States each year are likely to develop persistent opioid use. With this in mind, anesthesiologists at Bellevue Clinic and Surgery Center assembled an interdisciplinary quality improvement team focused on 2 goals: (1) develop effective anesthesia protocols that minimize perioperative opioids and (2) add value to clinical services by maintaining or improving perioperative outcomes while reducing costs. This article describes our project and findings but does not attempt to make inferences or generalizations about populations outside our facility. METHODS: We performed a large-scale implementation of opioid-sparing protocols at our standalone pediatric clinic and ambulatory surgery facility, based in part on the prior success of our previously published tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy protocol. Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were performed using data captured from the electronic medical record. The percentage of surgical patients receiving intraoperative opioids and postoperative morphine preintervention and postintervention were compared. The following measures were evaluated using statistical process control charts: maximum postoperative pain score, postoperative morphine rescue rate, total postanesthesia care unit minutes, total anesthesia minutes, and postoperative nausea and vomiting rescue rate. Intraoperative analgesic costs were calculated. RESULTS: Between January 2017 and June 2019, 10,948 surgeries were performed at Bellevue, with 10,733 cases included in the analyses. Between December 2017 and June 2019, intraoperative opioid administration at our institution decreased from 84% to 8%, and postoperative morphine administration declined from 11% to 6% using analgesics such as dexmedetomidine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia. Postoperative nausea and vomiting rescue rate decreased, while maximum postoperative pain scores, total anesthesia minutes, and total postanesthesia care unit minutes remained stable per control chart analyses. Costs improved. CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing dexmedetomidine, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and regional anesthesia for pediatric ambulatory surgeries at our facility, perioperative opioids were minimized without compromising patient outcomes or value.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.