The authors conducted a meta-analysis of the literature on associations between trauma survivors' PTSD symptoms and the (a) relationship quality and (b) psychological distress of intimate partners. Results yielded a small combined effect size (r = -.24) for the association between PTSD and partners' perceived relationship quality. Gender and military status moderated this association with a larger effect size for female partners of male trauma survivors than for male partners of female trauma survivors and a larger effect size for military samples than for civilians. The effect size of the association between PTSD and partners' psychological distress was moderate in magnitude (r = .30). Analysis of hypothesized moderators indicated this association was stronger among military than civilian samples. The association was also stronger among samples of survivors who experienced traumatic events in the more distant past compared with those who experienced more recent events. Results support the systemic impact of one family member's PTSD symptoms and highlight areas for future research.
The authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies on the correlation between parents' PTSD symptom severity and children's psychological status. An extensive search of the literature yielded 550 studies that were screened for inclusion criteria (i.e., parent assessed for PTSD, child assessed for distress or behavioral problems, associations between parent PTSD and child status examined). Sixty-two studies were further reviewed, resulting in a final sample of 42 studies. Results yielded a moderate overall effect size r = .35. The authors compared effect sizes for studies where only the parent was exposed to a potentially traumatic event to studies where both parents and children were exposed. A series of moderators related to sample characteristics (sex of parent, type of traumatic event) and study methods (self-report vs. diagnostic interview, type of child assessment administered) were also evaluated. The only significant moderator was type of trauma; the effect size was larger for studies with parent-child dyads who were both exposed to interpersonal trauma (r = .46) than for combat veterans and their children (r = .27) and civilian parent-child dyads who were both exposed to war (r = .25). Results support the importance of considering the family context of trauma survivors and highlight areas for future research.
Research with combat veterans and their spouses has documented the harmful impact of posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) on relationships, yet few studies have evaluated theoretically based models of relational processes among these couples. In this study, the authors tested 2 moderators of the association between male combat veterans' PTSS and their female spouses' reported relationship quality based on Bodenmann's (1997, 2005) systemic transactional theory of dyadic coping. We hypothesized that supportive dyadic coping and common dyadic coping would moderate the association of PTSS and spouses' relationship quality. Hypotheses were supported. The degree to which a veteran's PTSS was negatively associated with his spouse's relationship quality depended on whether she perceived him as supportive when she experiences stress (i.e., supportive dyadic coping) and the degree to which she perceived the couple as working together to manage difficulties (i.e., common dyadic coping). The significant interactions of PTSS with supportive and common dyadic coping accounted for 11.95% and 10.58% of the variance, respectively. Tests of conditional effects showed veterans' PTSS was only significantly negatively associated with spouses' relationship quality when supportive and common dyadic coping were low. Findings highlight the importance of adaptive dyadic coping behaviors as a protective factor for spouses of veterans and hold implications for research and practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.