Question: Is early neurological deterioration of ischemic origin (END i ) predictable in minor strokes with large vessel occlusion (LVO) treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT)?Findings: In a multicentric retrospective cohort of minor stroke patients (NIHSS≤5) with LVO intended for IVT alone (n=729), an easily applicable score based on occlusion site and thrombus length -two independent predictors of END i -showed good discriminative power for END i risk prediction, and was successfully validated in an independent cohort (n=347).Meaning: END i can be reliably predicted in IVT-treated minor strokes with LVO, which may help to select the best candidates for direct transfer for additional thrombectomy.

Background and purposeBetter understanding the incidence, predictors and mechanisms of early neurological deterioration (END) following intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) for acute stroke with mild symptoms and isolated internal carotid artery occlusion (iICAo) may inform therapeutic decisions.MethodsFrom a multicenter retrospective database, we extracted all patients with both National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score <6 and iICAo (i.e. not involving the Willis circle) on admission imaging, intended for IVT alone. END was defined as ≥4 NIHSS points increase within 24 h. END and no‐END patients were compared for (i) pre‐treatment clinical and imaging variables and (ii) occurrence of intracranial occlusion, carotid recanalization and parenchymal hemorrhage on follow‐up imaging.ResultsSeventy‐four patients were included, amongst whom 22 (30%) patients experienced END. Amongst pre‐treatment variables, suprabulbar carotid occlusion was the only admission predictor of END following stepwise variable selection (odds ratio = 4.0, 95% confidence interval: 1.3–12.2; P = 0.015). On follow‐up imaging, there was no instance of parenchymal hemorrhage, but an intracranial occlusion was now present in 76% vs. 0% of END and no‐END patients, respectively (P < 0.001), and there was a trend toward higher carotid recanalization rate in END patients (29% vs. 9%, P = 0.07). As compared to no‐END, END was strongly associated with a poor 3‐month outcome.ConclusionsEarly neurological deterioration is a frequent and highly deleterious event after IVT for minor stroke with iICAo, and is of thromboembolic origin in three out of four patients. The strong association with iICAo site—largely a function of underlying stroke etiology—may point to a different response of the thrombus to IVT. These findings suggest END may be preventable in this setting.

Intravenous (i.v.) recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) should be available on a 24/7 basis in hospitals admitting patients with stroke. We aimed at evaluating the influence of the number of patients previously treated with i.v. rt-PA by neurologists on patients' outcome. For each patient consecutively treated with i.v. rt-PA for cerebral ischaemia at the Lille University Hospital, we determined the number of previous treatments with rt-PA administered by the neurologist. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the influence of the experience on the outcome evaluated by the modified Rankin scale (mRS) after 3 months, 0-1 meaning independence, and 0-2 meaning absence of handicap. We compared outcomes of patients treated by the 25% less experienced neurologists with those of trials. Forty-four neurologists treated 800 patients. The experience of the treating neurologist was independently associated with independence (adjusted odds ratio [(adj)OR] 1.062 for 10 patients more; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.008-1.120), and absence of handicap ((adj)OR 1.076 for 10 patients more; 95%CI 1.016-1.140) at 3 months, but not with symptomatic intracerebral haemorrhage and death. The proportions of patients from the 1st quartile who were independent and without handicap at 3 months were 37.9 and 51.1%. Patients treated by less experienced neurologists, have similar outcomes than expected from trials, suggesting they benefit from thrombolysis. However, the outcome of patients treated by more experienced neurologists was slightly better. Less experienced neurologists should not be excluded from rt-PA programmes, but their practices should be evaluated and educational programmes organised.

No abstract