No abstract

No abstract

This paper aims to study how an event, happening within a political community characterised by a high level of interdependence, has an impact on the defence policy of its members. To do so, the paper focuses on British-Polish defence relations after Brexit. Indeed, the United Kingdom signed a defence cooperation agreement (dca) with Poland in 2017, which is the second with an EU/nato Member State (MS) after the Lancaster House treaty signed with France. This case-study questions the thesis positing that dcas are unlikely to happen between EU/nato MS as it would lead to overlaps and decoupling. It also determines to what extent this treaty is part of a British strategy to re-create a security network in Europe after Brexit to deter Russia, which is considered as one of the main threats for both countries. Finally, this study deals with the political uses of history. The research analyses how British and Polish actors select memory mines to consolidate friendship in time of uncertainty but also as a shaming strategy.

Résumé L’orientation atlantique de l’Europe centrale est analysée à travers l’exemple de trois pays : la Hongrie, la Pologne et la République tchèque. L’étude démontre que ce choix, fait juste après la fin de la guerre froide, n’était ni logique ni évident, mais tenait d’une construction politique dont les ressorts furent différents selon les cas considérés. L’atlantisme résultait tant de jeux politiques nationaux que de la formation de liens culturels ou de considérations géopolitiques. Cependant, si les modalités de son inscription à l’agenda furent variées, les raisons qui motivèrent celle-ci furent similaires et correspondaient à des besoins sécuritaires et identitaires. Enfin, cet exemple montre à quel point les passés douloureux ont influencé la construction de la politique étrangère.