No abstract

With their unique mechanism of action, bipolar and multipolar RF devices remain versatile treatment options associated with minimal downtime and pain compared with monopolar RF and other nonablative modalities. Proper patient selection and education along with an experienced treating physician is crucial in achieving patient satisfaction and results. It is important that larger studies are conducted to provide data on upcoming devices. Review of the literature provides a starting point for physicians seeking to treat patients safely and effectively with newer devices.

This study demonstrates that AWT is safe and efficacious for the treatment of localized adiposities in the saddlebag area. However, the results obtained were not statistically significant. Larger studies will be needed to further access the effects of AWT on thigh circumference reduction. Furthermore, the authors also found an improvement in the appearance of both cellulite and skin firmness after the treatments.

Background: Interviews for the integrated plastic surgery residency match took place in a virtual format for the 2020–2021 application cycle. Current literature lacks the perspectives of program directors (PDs) on virtual interviews compared with traditional in-person interviews. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, an anonymous 17-question survey was distributed by email to 82 program directors of integrated plastic surgery residency programs in the United States. Participants were asked baseline program information, the number of positions and interview invites offered, and their perspectives on various aspects of the virtual interview process. Results: Sixty-two (75.6%) PDs completed the survey. Thirty-seven percent reported increasing the number of interview offers per available residency spot. On a five-point Likert scale (1, not well at all; 5, extremely well), PDs showed no significant differences in their ability judge an applicant’s professionalism (3.1 ± 1.1), interpersonal and communication skills (3.2 ± 1.1), and “fit” with their program (2.9 ± 0.9) during virtual interviews (P = 0.360). Sixty-eight percent reported being satisfied (15.3% extremely satisfied, 52.5% somewhat satisfied) with the virtual interview process, though 76.3% preferred in-person interviews. Conclusions: This study is the first to provide insight into PDs’ impressions of virtual residency interviews. Although most reported being satisfied with the virtual interview process, the majority still preferred in-person interviews. Further long-term studies evaluating the pros and cons of each interview modality may provide more information on whether virtual interviews could become a sustainable alternative to the traditional in-person residency interview.

Background: While there has been ample interest and literature published regarding craniosynostosis surgical technique, there are few reports on adverse hospital and health system outcomes. The purpose of this study was to describe rate of and risk factors for complications, and adverse outcomes following craniosynostosis reconstruction. Methods: This study retrospectively reviewed the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Pediatric database and identified all patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair from 2012 to 2016. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify significant associations between preoperative risk factors and adverse outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was then used to identify independent risk factors and causes of prolonged operative times, transfusions, reoperation, prolonged length of hospital stays, and readmission. Results: There were 3924 patients included who underwent craniosynostosis repair, of whom 1732 underwent frontoorbital advancement and 2192 underwent cranial vault remodeling. Transfusion was the most common NSQIP reportable outcome, occurring for 66.5% of all patients. The incidence of reoperation was 2.4% and readmission was 3.0%. Conclusion: This study provides a large descriptive analysis of craniosynostosis repair throughout the United States. Largely nonmodifiable patient risk factors lead to worse health system metrics, with young age, gastrointestinal comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologist scores of 3 and greater, reoperation, and a prolonged length of stay as independent risk factors for readmission. This analysis can be used to identify the standard of practice in synostosis care and enhance the implementation of ancillary care services to provide safe and cost-effective care for patients undergoing craniosynostosis repair.