Steroid receptors define a family of ligand-activated transcription factors. Recent work has demonstrated that the receptors regulate distinct but overlapping gene networks, yet the mechanisms by which they do so remain unclear. We previously determined the microscopic binding energetics for progesterone receptor (PR) isoform assembly at promoters containing multiple response elements. We found that the two isoforms (PR-A and PR-B) share nearly identical dimerization and intrinsic DNA binding free energies, but maintain large differences in cooperative free energy. Moreover, cooperativity can be modulated by monovalent ion binding and promoter layout, suggesting that differences in cooperativity might control isoform-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor function. To determine whether cooperative binding energetics are common to other members of the steroid receptor family, we dissected the thermodynamics of estrogen receptor-α (ER-α):promoter interactions. We find that the ER-α intrinsic DNA binding free energy is identical to that of the PR isoforms. This was expected, noting that receptor DNA binding domains are highly conserved. Unexpectedly, ER-α generates negligible cooperativity – orders of magnitude less than predicted based on our studies of the PR isoforms. However, analysis of the cooperativity term suggests that it reflects a balance between highly favorable cooperative stabilization and unfavorable promoter bending. Moreover, ER-α cooperative free energy is compensated for by a large increase in dimerization free energy. Collectively, the results demonstrate that steroid receptors differentially partition not only cooperative energetics, but also dimerization energetics. We speculate that this ability serves as a framework for regulating receptor-specific promoter occupancy and thus receptor-specific gene regulation.

A major goal in biomedical research is to determine the mechanisms responsible for gene regulation. However, the promoters and operators that control transcription are often complex in nature, containing multiple-binding sites with which DNA-binding proteins can interact cooperatively. Quantitative DNase footprint titration is one of the few techniques capable of resolving the microscopic binding affinities responsible for the macroscopic assembly process. Here, we present a step-by-step protocol for carrying out a footprint titration experiment. We then describe how to quantify the resultant images to generate individual-site binding curves. Finally, we derive basic equations for binding at each site and present an overview of the fitting process, applying it to the anticipated results. Users should anticipate that the footprinting experiment will take 3-5 d starting from DNA template isolation to image acquisition and quantitation.

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) were once viewed only as mediators of toxicity, but it is now recognized that they also contribute to redox signaling through oxidation of specific cysteine thiols on regulatory proteins. Cells in sparse cultures have increased ROS relative to confluent cultures, but it is not known whether protein redox states are affected under these conditions. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether culture conditions affect the redox state of thioredoxin-1 (Trx1), the protein responsible for reducing most oxidized proteins in the cytoplasm and nucleus. The results showed that Trx1 was more oxidized in sparse HeLa cell cultures than in confluent cells. The glutathione pool was also more oxidized, demonstrating that both of the major cellular redox regulating systems were affected by culture density. In addition, the total amount of Trx1 protein was lower and the subcellular distribution of Trx1 was different in sparse cells. Trx1 in sparse cultures was predominantly nuclear whereas it was predominantly cytoplasmic in confluent cultures. This localization pattern was not unique to HeLa cells as it was also observed in A549, Cos-1 and HEK293 cells. These findings demonstrate that Trx1 is subject to changes in expression, redox state and subcellular localization with changing culture density, indicating that the redox environments of the cytoplasm and the nucleus are distinct and have different requirements under different culture conditions.

No abstract