No abstract

For the first time estrogen DNA-adducts were identified in DNA human breast tumor tissue using nano-LC coupled to nano-Electrospray Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Normal breast tissue was analyzed analogously. The data obtained in the five breast tumor and five adjacent normal tissue samples were compared qualitatively, but no straightforward difference was observed. Prior to LC-MS analysis the DNA was enzymatically hydrolyzed to a nucleoside pool. The DNA-hydrolysates were directly injected onto a column switching system developed for on-line sample clean-up and subsequent analysis of the DNA-adducts. In four patients using Premarin, DNA-adducts of 4-hydroxy-equilenin (4OHEN) were detected. All except three samples contained DNA-adducts from 4-hydroxy-estradiol or 4-hydroxy-estrone. Also DNA isolated from eight alcohol fixed and paraffin embedded breast tumor tissue showed the presence of different estrogen DNA-adducts. Worthwhile mentioning is the presence of adducts responding to m/z 570 Ͼ m/z 454 transition. This is a well-known SRM-transition indicative for the presence of the 2'-deoxyguanosine (dGuo) adduct of Benzo H ormone treatment is widespread for women of all ages. In the United States, for instance, 30% of post-menopausal women use hormone eeplacement therapy (HRT) [1], e.g., Premarin. Studies in which the development of breast and endometrial cancer was associated with estrogen therapy [2][3][4][5][6] were supported by a more recent follow-up study in which it was demonstrated that post-menopausal women have an increased risk of breast cancer when using estrogens, especially in combination with progestin [7]. In animals, too, a relationship between the administration of estrogens and the development of cancer was shown [8].The carcinogenic properties of estrogens are explained by direct stimulation of cell proliferation via estrogen receptor mediated mechanisms [9,10] and by mechanisms based on metabolic activation [11][12][13][14], leading to DNA damage such as oxidative damage [15][16][17][18] and the formation of DNA-adducts [19 -28], which can cause mutations and induce cancer [29].The latter pathways are the result of metabolic activation of estrogens by the cytochrome P-450 system leading to 2-and 4-hydroxy derivatives. The 2-hydroxy estrogens are excreted in the urine as a result of their fast transformation to water-soluble compounds [13,14]. The 4-hydroxy form, however, has a longer half-life

No abstract

Probiotics have been proposed for a number of urogenital infectious conditions. In this study, we examine a possible effect on human papillomavirus (HPV)-related precancerous lesions in cervical cytology. We conducted a prospective controlled pilot study, in which 54 women with an HPV+low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion diagnosis in their PAP smear were followed for 6 months. The intervention group consumed a daily probiotic drink during the study period; the control group received no treatment, according to common care policy. Outcome measures were the control PAP smear and HPV status after 6 months. Probiotic users had a twice as high chance of clearance of cytological abnormalities (60 vs. 31%, P=0.05). HPV was cleared in 19% of control patients versus 29% of probiotic users (P=0.41). This exploratory pilot study suggests that the probiotic studied promotes the clearance of HPV-related cytological abnormalities. If confirmed, this would represent an entirely new option to manage cervical cancer precursors.

The five‐year survival for women with Stage I borderline tumors is about 95% to 97%, but because of late recurrence the 10‐year survival is only 70% to 95%. The five‐year survival for Stage II‐III patients is 65% to 87%. A more correct staging procedure, classification of true serous implants, and agreement on how the presence of gelatinous ascites in mucinous tumors contributes to cancer stage might change the distribution of stage and survival data by stage for women with borderline tumors in the future. Independent prognostic factors for patients with borderline tumors without residual tumor after primary surgery are: DNA ploidy, morphometry, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histologic type, and age. Different types of surgery and chemotherapy were not independent prognostic factors. Questions which should be addressed include the following: 1) Have patients with borderline tumors been overtreated in general, and how should these patients be treated? 2) In which group of patients is fertility‐sparing surgery advisable? 3) Do patients with borderline tumors benefit from adjuvant treatment? And 4) How is the high‐risk patient defined? Semin. Surg. Oncol. 19:69–75, 2000. © 2000 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.