The purpose of this study is to use unsupervised cluster methodology to identify phenotype and mucosal eosinophilia endotype subgroups of patients with medical refractory chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), and evaluate the difference in quality of life (QOL) outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) between these clusters for better surgical case selection. A prospective cohort study included 131 patients with medical refractory CRS who elected ESS. The Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) was used to evaluate QOL before and 12 months after surgery. Unsupervised two-step clustering method was performed. One hundred and thirteen subjects were retained in this study: 46 patients with CRS without nasal polyps and 67 patients with nasal polyps. Nasal polyps, gender, mucosal eosinophilia profile, and prior sinus surgery were the most discriminating factors in the generated clusters. Three clusters were identified. A significant clinical improvement was observed in all clusters 12 months after surgery with a reduction of SNOT-22 scores. There was a significant difference in QOL outcomes between clusters; cluster 1 had the worst QOL improvement after FESS in comparison with the other clusters 2 and 3. All patients in cluster 1 presented CRSwNP with the highest mucosal eosinophilia endotype. Clustering method is able to classify CRS phenotypes and endotypes with different associated surgical outcomes.

The aim of this study was to validate the Moroccan translation and sociocultural adaptation of the RhinoQOL questionnaire. The questionnaires were translated into Moroccan and then translated back into English. The final version was administered twice to an asymptomatic control population (n = 50) and once to a patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) (n = 99). Both of the groups answered the questionnaire before and one year after surgery. The psychometric properties, reliability, validity with correlation to other clinical instruments and responsiveness to treatment, were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. The test-retest reliability was excellent [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) >0.9], indicating a good reliability when administering the instrument on repeated occasions. The internal consistency was 0.80, 0.75 and 0.94 for the scores of the RhinoQOL sub-scales (frequency, bothersomeness, and impact, respectively). Firstly, our questionnaire was able to detect differences between patients with CRS and group of healthy volunteers (p < 0.0001) and secondly, it improved significantly after surgery (p < 0.0001), indicating a good responsiveness. A good correlation was found between the Moroccan version, the preoperative objective scores, and SNOT-22 and RSDI scores. The Moroccan RhinoQOL questionnaire appears to be culturally appropriate and psychometrically valid.