No abstract

Introduction Perilunate and fracture dislocations predominantly follow a high-energy mechanism. Perilunate dislocations have an incidence of 0.5/105 individuals/year, occurring at a mean age of 26 years and are frequently seen in men. This study aimed to describe the characteristics of this injury in elderly population of patients using literature review and our experience with four cases aged >65 years. Materials and Methods We treated four patients with perilunate dislocation aged >65 years. All the patients’ medical records were reviewed retrospectively. A literature review for case studies of perilunate dislocation was conducted with the purpose of finding cases including patients aged >65 years. Results Three of our patients had injuries that were missed in the first visit in the emergency department. The mechanism of injury was high energy in only two patients. Two patients had posterior perilunate dislocation, while the other two had transradial perilunate dislocation. Three patients were available for follow-up. The overall outcome was satisfaction according the Mayo wrist score and minimal disability according to the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score. All patients reported that pain was absent and they were able to return to their regular activities. The literature review found only seven papers documenting treatment of patients aged >65 years. Discussion Perilunate dislocation is extremely rare in the population aged >65 years. Although the rate of missed diagnosis in our cohort was extremely high, the overall satisfaction and return to function was high. Conclusions This case series and literature review highlight the unique characteristics of this injury in the age group of patients aged >65 years. Although perilunate dislocation in patients aged >65 years is rare, clinicians should be aware of the presentation of this condition in the elderly.

To determine the time needed or the development of a positive result on the wrinkle test among patients with complete laceration of a digital nerve in a clinical setting. We prospectively recruited 20 patients who had undergone surgery for digital nerve laceration. The wrinkle test was conducted at a follow-up session up to 2 months after surgery, and the time to a positive wrinkling result was recorded. The wrinkle test was compared between the patient’s injured versus uninjured contralateral finger. The average time required for a positive result on the wrinkle test was 24.5 min (± 11), with 25% patients requiring 40 min to obtain a positive result. When evaluating a patient with digital nerve injury in a "non-laboratory" environment, the wrinkle test may require up to 40 min to obtain a positive result. Our study suggests that if tests are completed following the generally accepted time limit reported in the literature (30 min), up to 25% of tests may produce false negative results.