Cervical interbody device subsidence can result in screw breakage, plate dislodgement, and/or kyphosis. Preoperative bone density measurement may be helpful in predicting the complications associated with anterior cervical surgery. This is especially important when a motion preserving device is implanted given the detrimental effect of subsidence on the postoperative segmental motion following disc replacement. To evaluate the structural properties of the cervical endplate and examine the correlation with CT measured trabecular bone density. Eight fresh human cadaver cervical spines (C2-T1) were CT scanned and the average trabecular bone densities of the vertebral bodies (C3-C7) were measured. Each endplate surface was biomechanically tested for regional yield load and stiffness using an indentation test method. Overall average density of the cervical vertebral body trabecular bone was 270 +/- 74 mg/cm3. There was no significant difference between levels. The yield load and stiffness from the indentation test of the endplate averaged 139 +/- 99 N and 156 +/- 52 N/mm across all cervical levels, endplate surfaces, and regional locations. The posterior aspect of the endplate had significantly higher yield load and stiffness in comparison to the anterior aspect and the lateral aspect had significantly higher yield load in comparison to the midline aspect. There was a significant correlation between the average yield load and stiffness of the cervical endplate and the trabecular bone density on regression analysis. Although there are significant regional variations in the endplate structural properties, the average of the endplate yield loads and stiffnesses correlated with the trabecular bone density. Given the morbidity associated with subsidence of interbody devices, a reliable and predictive method of measuring endplate strength in the cervical spine is required. Bone density measures may be used preoperatively to assist in the prediction of the strength of the vertebral endplate. A threshold density measure has yet to be established where the probability of endplate fracture outweighs the benefit of anterior cervical procedure.

No abstract

There is a significant loss of endplate integrity when 1 mm of endplate (44% loss) or 2 mm of endplate (52% loss) is removed. Although the implant interface plays an important role in the magnitude of the subsidence of a device, this study in general shows that the endplate is important in terms of maximizing the strength of a construct.

The Dynesys dynamic instrumentation system seems to stabilize degenerative spondylolisthesis. As expected in the degenerative lumbar spine, the segmental motion of the implanted level in this study was limited and considerably less than normal spinal motion.

Graft subsidence following anterior cervical reconstruction can result in the loss of sagittal balance and recurring foraminal stenosis. This study examined the implant-endplate interface using a cyclic fatigue loading protocol in an attempt to model the subsidence seen in vivo. The superior endplate from 30 cervical vertebrae (C3 to T1) were harvested and biomechanically tested in axial compression with one of three implants: Fibular allograft; titanium mesh cage packed with cancellous chips; and trabecular metal. Each construct was cyclically loaded from 50 to 250 N for 10,000 cycles. Nondestructive cyclic loading of the cervical endplate-implant construct resulted in a stiffer construct independent of the type of the interbody implant tested. The trabecular metal construct demonstrated significantly more axial stability and significantly less subsidence in comparison to the titanium mesh construct. Although the allograft construct resulted in more subsidence than the trabecular metal construct, the difference was not significant and no difference was found when comparing axial stability. For all constructs, the majority of the subsidence during the cyclic testing occurred during the first 500 cycles and was followed by a more gradual settling in the remaining 9,500 cycles. Keywords: cervical endplate; fatigue; cyclic testing; biomechanics; subsidence Anterior cervical fusion has traditionally been a predictable and reliable surgical technique for treatment of multiple spinal pathologies. [1][2][3] The success has been due to factors that are addressed by the surgical procedure: the removal of the pathologic process; the decompression of the neural elements; the correction of sagittal balance; and the stabilization of the motion segment. Maintenance of sagittal balance and continued stabilization of the motion segment following anterior reconstruction is essential in obtaining a successful clinical outcome. Subsidence of an interbody graft or construct prior to bony fusion can be detrimental to sagittal balance and/or stabilization of the motion segment resulting in recurrent foraminal stenosis.Options available for reconstructing the anterior cervical column include a structural autograft, a structural allograft, a carbon fiber cage, a PEEK cage, a titanium mesh cage, or a trabecular metal spacer. Material properties and interface geometries vary, but the devices function similarly by providing mechanical integrity and stability to the construct while bony fusion takes place. Independent of the device, settling occurs following anterior interbody fusion, 4-6 the amount of which is affected by intraoperative endplate injury or removal, osteoporosis, and the cross-sectional area of the implant. 7,8 Obtaining contact between the endplate and implant surfaces is technically challenging, and a certain amount of settling occurs early post-operatively. With bony implants, additional settling occurs as the graft is resorbed prior to bone fusion. The amount of settling is often <1 mm. Other causes of post-op...