No abstract

Background: Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of non Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).Nearly 50% of high-risk DLBCL patients are not cured with standard rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (RCHOP). High risk DLBCL may be defined as double hit lymphoma (DHL, translocation of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6), double expressor lymphoma (DEL, over expression of MYC and BCL2), high risk international prognostic index (IPI) of 3-5, high Ki-67, and non-germinal center subtype (non-GCB). The majority of DHL cases occur in the GCB subtype, as opposed to the majority of DEL cases which occur in non-GCB. Hence we sought to compare different high risk subsets treated with dose-adjusted etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, prednisone and rituximab (DA) EPOCH-R. In single arm phase II clinical trials, dose adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R has shown promising results, with potential greater efficacy in the GCB subtype in subset analyses (Wilson et al, Hematologica 2012). A randomized phase III study comparing RCHOP with (DA) EPOCH-R in newly diagnosed DLBCL has completed accrual, with highly anticipated results due in late 2016. Methods: We conducted a retrospective reviewof all consecutive, newly diagnosed DLBCL patients treated with (DA) EPOCH-R at MD Anderson Cancer Center from 2010 to 2014. Eligible patients were 18 years or greater, had high-risk DLBCL as determined by the treating physician, and had available data of treatment and response. The cell of origin subtype was determined by immunohistochemistry using Hans algorithm, and MYC and BCL2 positivity were defined as BCL2 positive in at least 70% and MYC positive in at least 40% of cells. DHL was defined as rearrangement of MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 by fluorescent in situ hybridization. The objectives were to analyze demographic, prognostic, and treatment variables in comparison with clinical response and survival outcomes in three sub groups which included 1. DHL (GCB) 2. DLBCL without MYC and BCL2 expression (GCB), and 3. DEL (GCB and non GCB). Complete response (CR), overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated using standard methods. Statistical analysis was done using Fishers exact test or Chi-square test / Kruskal-Wallis test. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis including overall survival and progression free survival. The Log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in time-to-event endpoints between patient groups. Results: We identified 233 high risk DLBCL patients treated with (DA) EPOCH-R. After filtering the data to identify patients which were included in our three groups, we identified 22 patients with DHL (GCB), 46 patients with non DEL (GCB), and 16 with DEL. The demographic features and outcomes are mentioned in the table 1 below. The DHL group had more frequent bone marrow (BM) involvement, and the DHL and DEL groups were more frequently age >60 years and high IPI in comparison to the non DEL GCB group. The CR rate, OS and PFS at 1 year were not significantly different between these three groups. Figure 1 highlights the OS (A) and PFS (B) results of each group. Conclusions: (DA) EPOCH-R is highly effective in patients with subsets of patients with high-risk DLBCL and may be able to overcome prognostic factors which have been shown to be adverse with RCHOP therapy. The results of this retrospective study suggest that OS in DHL, DEL and non DEL (GCB) are not statistically different. Hence, intensive chemotherapy with (DA) EPOCH-R could be considered as a frontline treatment option for patients with high risk DLBCL, pending further confirmation in randomized trials. Disclosures Oki: Novartis: Research Funding. Fowler:Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Roche: Consultancy, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Jannsen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Wang:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; BeiGene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Fayad:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Westin:ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Due to ~50% risk of relapse with standard therapy (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone, R-CHOP), an increasing number of patients with high risk diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are being treated with dose-adjusted (DA) EPOCH-R (rituximab, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, cyclophosphamide). DA-EPOCH-R contains a 96-hour continuous infusion can be delivered either in the inpatient or outpatient setting, via use of ambulatory infusion pumps. Potential advantages of outpatient therapy include reduced inpatient burden for routine chemotherapy, less exposure to resistant bacterial infections, increased patient satisfaction, and reduced cost. The ability to administer outpatient DA-EPOCH-R is dependent on the ability of the healthcare facility to administer the regimen safely while maintaining dose adjustments and schedule. We hypothesize that patients who receive DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient have similar outcomes and toxicity rates as patients who receive the regimen as an inpatient. We further hypothesize that there is a significant cost benefit for patients to receive DA-EPOCH-R as an outpatient. Methods: This was a retrospective database analysis of newly diagnosed consecutive DLBCL patients ≥ 18 years of age who received DA-EPOCH-R chemotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 2010 and 2014. Patients with double hit lymphoma defined as having a MYC and BCL2 or BCL6 translocation were excluded due to their aggressive nature. We descriptively analyzed demographic variables in this population including, age, gender, international prognostic index (IPI)) and outcome (overall response rates (ORR), complete response (CR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and hospital admission for neutropenic fever events). Additionally, we evaluated the number of outpatient cycles received in relation to survival outcomes and neutropenic fever events. Statistical analysis was done using Fisher's exact test or Chi-square test to evaluate the association between two categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to evaluate the difference in a continuous variable between patient groups. Kaplan-Meier method was used for time-to-event analysis including overall survival and progression free survival. The Log-rank test was used to evaluate the difference in time-to-event endpoints between patient groups. Results: A total of 196 patients had data available for analysis, with 138 patients (70.4%) receiving all cycles as an inpatient, while 58 patients (29.6%) received at least 1 outpatient cycle of DA-EPOCH-R (Table 1). Compared with patients who received no outpatient cycle, the patients who received any outpatient therapy were younger, had a lower proportion of high IPI, and experienced fewer episodes of febrile neutropenia. The median OS and PFS for the entire population has not been reached, with a median follow-up time for the censored observations of 2.78 years (range: 0.24 - 8.64 years). The difference in OS between the patients who had any outpatient therapy and no outpatient therapy was not significant by the log-rank test (p-value=0.11). The difference in PFS between the patients who had any outpatient therapy and no outpatient therapy was marginally significant for OS by the log-rank test (p-value=0.07). Our cost analysis for 6 cycles of inpatient DA-EPOCH-R is estimated to be ~$88K, or $14.6K/cycle. The cost savings incurred for chemotherapy only expenses for each outpatient cycle is at least $3.3K/cycle or $19.8K for a total of 6 cycles. Conclusion: DA-EPOCH-R is a highly effective regimen for treating aggressive DLBCL which can be administered in an outpatient setting safely, efficaciously, and in a cost-effective manner without any apparent effect on outcome or rate of admission for neutropenic fever. There can be savings of about of nearly $20K per patient for a 6-cycle course of therapy. In our series, patients who received outpatient therapy were younger and may have had greater social support, which could potentially confound results. This retrospective analysis supports the use of outpatient DA-EPOCH-R, but additional studies are warranted to evaluate which patients may benefit most. Disclosures Oki: Novartis: Research Funding. Nastoupil:Janssen: Other: Travel, Accommodations, Expenses, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding. Fowler:Pharmacyclics, LLC, an AbbVie Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Research Funding. Wang:Asana BioSciences: Research Funding; Acerta: Consultancy, Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria; BeiGene: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Asana biosciences, Beigene, Celgene, Juno, Kite, Onyx, Pharmacyclics: Research Funding. Fayad:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Westin:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Chugai: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; ProNAi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

No abstract

No abstract