Objective. To assess the efficacy and safety of vaccination against pandemic H1N1 virus in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) compared with healthy controls. Methods. The study population comprised 41 RA patients, 21 SLE patients, 17 PsA patients, 15 AS patients, and 25 healthy controls. All were vaccinated using the Novartis MF59-adjuvanted H1N1v monovalent influenza vaccine. The immunogenicity of the vaccine was assessed on day 1 and again 4 weeks later by hemagglutination inhibition assay. Geometric mean titers and seroconversion rates were calculated for each group. The safety of the vaccine was evaluated using the 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) for RA and PsA, the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI), and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). Results. The proportion of baseline protective levels of antibodies against H1N1 was similar in all but the AS group, in which it was lower. The geometric mean titers increased significantly in all 5 groups. A substantial proportion of patients and controls responded to the vaccine. The healthy controls demonstrated a better response than each of the other groups: 84% versus 56% for RA, 67% for SLE, 59% for PsA, and 53% for AS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified RA and PsA as parameters of significantly lower response. The DAS28, BASDAI, and SLEDAI remained unchanged after vaccination. Conclusion. Vaccination against pandemic H1N1 using an adjuvanted H1N1v monovalent influenza is safe and induced an appropriate response in patients with RA, SLE, PsA, and AS.
Introduction Elderly patients are underrepresented in clinical trials evaluating the management of non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients. Moreover, frailty status is often not reported in these trials. Purpose To evaluate the association of invasive management with outcome among elderly (≥80) patients presenting with NSTEMI by frailty status. Methods Retrospective cohort of consecutive elderly patients who were hospitalized with NSTEMI as a primary clinical diagnosis between 2008 to 2019. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Frailty status was estimated as a continuous variable as well as categorized to low, medium, and high. Cox regression models were applied with stratification by frailty status. Additional sensitivity analyses were conducted including propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) models. Results Study population included 2,317 patients with median age of 86 years (IQR 83–90) of whom 1,243 (54%) were men. Patients who were managed invasively (n=581 [25%]) were less likely to be frail (7% vs. 44%, p<.001). During the follow up (median of 19 months, [IQR 4–41]), 1,599 (69%) patients died. Kaplan Meier survival curves (Figure 1) show that the cumulative probability of death at 19 months was 50% among patients who were managed conservatively compared with 21% among invasively managed patients (p Log rank <.001). In the multivariable Cox model, invasive approach was associated with a significant 39% decrease in the risk of death (95% CI 0.53–0.71). The benefit of invasive approach was consistent among low, medium, and high frailty subgroups with adjusted HRs of 0.74 [0.58–0.93], 0.65 [0.50–0.85] and 0.52 [0.34–0.78], respectively; p for interaction NS). Results were consistent with PSM and IPTW analyses (HR of 0.6 [0.50–0.71] and 0.67 [0.55–0.82], respectively). Additional sensitivity analysis addressing potential immortal time bias and residual confounding yielded similar results. Conclusions Invasive approach is associated with improved survival among elderly patients with NSTEMI irrespective of frailty status. Our results support and extend recent ESC recommendations for the management of elderly patients with NSTEMI FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Figure 1
Seeds acquire fungal endophytes either from the environment or from their progenitors. These transmission modes are central in shaping the microbiome as they affect species composition and balance. We studied fungal endophyte communities (FEC) in three plant species: bread wheat (Triticum aestivum), wild emmer wheat (Triticum turgidum dicoccoides), and wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum). We conducted two experiments to test seed-to-seed transmission: (i) we compared FECs in stems and seeds collected from agricultural and natural habitats, and (ii) we grew plants under greenhouse conditions to isolate the effect of vertical transmission on the plant FECs. The analysis of seed communities revealed differences in FEC composition and diversity among plant species; however, Alternaria infectoria dominated FECs in all plant species. In field-collected plants, the number of taxa in the seeds was less than half the number in stems, and close to 90% of the seed taxa were found in stems. The FECs from stems and seeds of greenhouse-grown plants were more diverse than the FECs of original seeds; they lacked a single dominant taxon, and new seeds FECs had a similar richness and diversity to stems FECs, with only 40% overlap. The controlled environment experiment confirmed vertical transmission of certain species but also showed that external infection of the seeds is the main source for specific taxa. Our results show that many taxa can reach the seeds internally, albeit in different abundance, that both infection sources affect seed FECs composition, and that external conditions the balance between FECs within the plant.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.