We consider the following dynamic load-balancing process: given an underlying graph G with n nodes, in each step t ≥ 0, one unit of load is created, and placed at a randomly chosen graph node. In the same step, the chosen node picks a random neighbor, and the two nodes balance their loads by averaging them. We are interested in the expected gap between the minimum and maximum loads at nodes as the process progresses, and its dependence on n and on the graph structure.Similar variants of the above graphical balanced allocation process have been studied by Peres, Talwar, and Wieder [10], and by Sauerwald and Sun [12] for regular graphs. These authors left as open the question of characterizing the gap in the case of cycle graphs in the dynamic case, where weights are created during the algorithm's execution. For this case, the only known upper bound is of O(n log n), following from a majorization argument due to [10], which analyzes a related graphical allocation process.In this paper, we provide an upper bound of O( √ n log n) on the expected gap of the above process for cycles of length n. We introduce a new potential analysis technique, which enables us to bound the difference in load between k-hop neighbors on the cycle, for any k ≤ n/2. We complement this with a "gap covering" argument, which bounds the maximum value of the gap by bounding its value across all possible subsets of a certain structure, and recursively bounding the gaps within each subset. We provide analytical and experimental evidence that our upper bound on the gap is tight up to a logarithmic factor.
We consider the following dynamic load-balancing process: given an underlying graph G with n nodes, in each step $$t\ge 0$$ t ≥ 0 , a random edge is chosen, one unit of load is created, and placed at one of the endpoints. In the same step, assuming that loads are arbitrarily divisible, the two nodes balance their loads by averaging them. We are interested in the expected gap between the minimum and maximum loads at nodes as the process progresses, and its dependence on n and on the graph structure. Peres et al. (Random Struct Algorithms 47(4):760–775, 2015) studied the variant of this process, where the unit of load is placed in the least loaded endpoint of the chosen edge, and the averaging is not performed. In the case of dynamic load balancing on the cycle of length n the only known upper bound on the expected gap is of order $$\mathcal {O}( n \log n )$$ O ( n log n ) , following from the majorization argument due to the same work. In this paper, we leverage the power of averaging and provide an improved upper bound of $$\mathcal {O} ( \sqrt{n} \log n )$$ O ( n log n ) . We introduce a new potential analysis technique, which enables us to bound the difference in load between k-hop neighbors on the cycle, for any $$k \le n/2$$ k ≤ n / 2 . We complement this with a “gap covering” argument, which bounds the maximum value of the gap by bounding its value across all possible subsets of a certain structure, and recursively bounding the gaps within each subset. We also show that our analysis can be extended to the specific instance of Harary graphs. On the other hand, we prove that the expected second moment of the gap is lower bounded by $$\Omega (n)$$ Ω ( n ) . Additionally, we provide experimental evidence that our upper bound on the gap is tight up to a logarithmic factor.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.