IntroductionCreating an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) to provide a patent and long-term vascular access (VA) for hemodialysis (HD) still remains a challenge. A methodical approach to choosing the appropriate HD access in accordance with patients' end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) life plan will help them achieve their goals safely. This study summarizes the impact of various factors on the AVF outcomes in an Indian population as well as the necessary considerations before choosing the site of AVF creation. Materials and methodsThis study involved a single-center, retrospective evaluation of all patients who had undergone arteriovenous (AV) access creation for maintenance HD from October 2018 to August 2019 at a center in India. ResultsIn our study of 216 cases, the average age at presentation was 43.9 years and the difference in age between the successful and unsuccessful group was not significant. The successful outcomes in males were significantly higher than those in females (p=0.005). The mean venous diameter in the successful group was significantly larger than that in the unsuccessful group. The distal arterial and vein diameter was higher in both males and females of the laborer group compared to the clerical group; however, the outcomes were comparable. The overall complication rate was 22.22%. We had primary patency rates of 83% at the end of one year with a primary failure rate of 8.80%. ConclusionVein diameter was the most important predictive factor for a successful outcome in our study. Factors like age and life expectancy, gender, comorbidities, occupation, and type of anastomosis may not be individually predictive of outcomes but need to be considered before choosing the appropriate site of access creation according to the life plan of the patient. This will reduce morbidity associated with an additional procedure and facilitate the initiation of HD as early as possible. Occupation can be considered as a surrogate for preoperative forearm exercises with the increased caliber of vessels found in people performing heavy/manual labor favoring a more distal AVF creation.

Background Setting the angle of tip rotation is of utmost importance in achieving satisfactory results in rhinoplasty. Conventionally the upward rotation of the tip requires shortening of the septum by caudal resection and shortening of the lateral walls by cephalic trim of the alar cartilages. The results are usually assessed subjectively. We describe the use of objective parameters to ensure accuracy of nasal tip rotation in patients operated with “cock-up” alar cartilage flaps, a modification of the cephalic trim. Methods Fifteen patients with a long nose having adequate width of lateral crura, desiring a shorter nose with upward tip rotation, were included in the study. Values of preoperative and desired nasolabial angle (from morphed images), and the derived columellar–labial angle were documented. Nasal tip rotation was set to the derived angle and maintained using cock-up alar cartilage flaps. The outcome was evaluated by digital measurements of the nasolabial angle and patients’ feedback by Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation (ROE) score. Results Satisfactory tip rotation and an aesthetic supratip area could be achieved. The difference in preoperative and postoperative nasolabial angles was statistically significant (p value < 0.0001). The difference in desired and the obtained nasolabial angle was not significant (p value 0.085). The results were maintained on subsequent follow-up. Conclusion Application of angles in practice and use of K-wire template helps us achieve accurate and consistent results. Cock-up flap is an effective technique—to obtain an open nasolabial angle and a desirable supratip region by making use of tissues otherwise discarded.

No abstract