No abstract

Highlights All neurosurgical procedures decreased in number during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surgical complication rates remained within the acceptable range. Emergency procedures numbers remained the same throughout the study period. Neurosurgical oncology cases were the highest in frequency. There is a decline in hospital length of stay as we progressed during the study period.

Background: During the initial phases of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, there was an unfounded fervor surrounding the use of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ); however, recently, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has recommended against routine use of HCQ outside of study protocols citing possible adverse outcomes. Methods: Multiple databases were searched to identify articles on COVID-19. An unadjusted odds ratio (OR) was used to calculate the safety and efficacy of HCQ on a random effect model. Results: Twelve studies comprising 3,912 patients (HCQ 2,512 and control 1400) were included. The odds of all-cause mortality (OR: 2.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.58-3.13, P value < 0.00001) were significantly higher in patients on HCQ compared to patients on control agent. The response to therapy assessed by negative repeat polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (OR: 1.83, 95% CI: 0.50-6.75, P = 0.36), radiological resolution (OR: 1.98, 95% CI: 0.47-8.36, P value = 0.36) and the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) (OR: 1.21, 95% CI: 0.34-4.33, P value = 0.76) were identical between the two groups. Overall, four times higher odds of net adverse events (NAEs) were observed in the HCQ group (OR: 4.59, 95% CI 1.73-12.20, P value = 0.02). The measures for individual safety endpoints were also numerically lower in the control arm; however, none of these values reached the level of statistical significance. Conclusions: HCQ might offer no benefits in terms of decreasing the viral load and radiological improvement in patients with COVID-19. HCQ appears to be associated with higher odds of all-cause mortality and NAEs.

No abstract

Hypersensitivity reactions occur when a host exhibits an inappropriate or exaggerated response to allergens. Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are examples of such exaggerated responses to various drugs or illnesses. Both conditions affect the skin and mucosal surfaces of the oral cavity, urethra, and conjunctiva to varying degrees. TEN involves more than 30% of the total body surface area as opposed to SJS with less than 10% involvement. Skin biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosis; however, obtaining appropriate clinical context at presentation with the history of a potential offending drug can help diagnose the condition in situations where skin biopsy is not feasible. Metronidazole has been rarely reported as the offending agent for TEN/SJS with only two previously reported cases in the literature. We present the third case of TEN secondary to metronidazole and discuss the potential mechanism of action of metronidazole along with its common side effects. Our case adds to the existing literature of this rare clinical presentation and highlights the importance of the judicious use of metronidazole in clinical practice.