Help-seeking is an essential tool
for student success. Still, students,
especially those underrepresented in STEM (UR-STEM) and those underrepresented
in chemistry (UR-Chem), may be reluctant to employ help-seeking for
academic success. Understanding help-seeking in online courses is
crucial for developing equitable learning environments where students
can engage with a community of inquiry. We analyzed help-seeking behaviors
and responses to requests for help in an online college-level chemistry
course’s discussion forum. We found that requests for help
were responded to equally, regardless of how explicitly students appealed
for help. Furthermore, we found that UR-Chem students requested and
responded to help similarly and received help at greater rates than
their non-UR-Chem peers. Results support that productive and substantive
help-seeking and help-giving discussions occur in an online discussion
forum. Ultimately this work highlights a necessary learning skill,
help-seeking, thereby informing chemistry instruction and learning.
Little is known about the online learning behaviors of students traditionally underrepresented in STEM fields (i.e., UR-STEM students), as well as how those behaviors impact important learning outcomes. The present study examined the relationship between online discussion forum engagement and success for UR-STEM and non-UR-STEM students, using the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model as our theoretical framework. Social network analysis and nested regression models were used to explore how three different measures of forum engagement-1) total number of posts written, 2) number of help-seeking posts written and replied to, and 3) level of connectivity-were related to improvement (i.e., relative performance gains) for 70 undergraduate students enrolled in an online introductory STEM course. We found a significant positive relationship between help-seeking and improvement and nonsignificant effects of general posting and connectivity; these results held for UR-STEM and non-UR-STEM students alike. Our findings suggest that online help-seeking has benefits for course improvement beyond what can be predicted by posting alone and that one need not be well connected in a class network to achieve positive learning outcomes. Finally, UR-STEM students demonstrated greater grade improvement than their non-UR-STEM counterparts, which suggests that the online environment has the potential to combat barriers to success that disproportionately affect underrepresented students.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.